Struggling West Virginia a ‘work in progress’ | TribLIVE.com
WVU

Struggling West Virginia a ‘work in progress’

Associated Press
1651929_web1_1651929-58c8133346464c1593e326e406b11a69
AP
West Virginia quarterback Austin Kendall (left) looks for an open receiver as he runs from Missouri’s Khalil Oliver during the first half Saturday, Sept. 7, 2019, in Columbia, Mo.

West Virginia coach Neal Brown calls his team a “work in progress,” one that isn’t progressing fast enough with a week left until the start of the Big 12 season.

The blocking of the offensive line stinks. The running game is nonexistent, and the quarterback play has been inconsistent. Across-the-board improvements are sorely needed Saturday when West Virginia (1-1) hosts North Carolina State (2-0), which has outscored its first two opponents 75-6.

“We’ve got to go back to the drawing board,” right guard Josh Sills said. “You have to win your one-on-one matchups.”

Brown didn’t inherit a lineup of marquee players when he arrived in January after Dana Holgorsen left for Houston.

The coach said the offensive line was “fully taken advantage of” in a 38-7 loss at Missouri on Saturday.

“We’re a work in progress. I’ve been saying that really since I got here,” Brown said. “That’s not negative. That’s where we’re at. We have some deficiencies. I’ve been pretty open about those.”

Brown made several moves during preseason camp and will continue to do some tinkering.

Sills, a second team all-Big 12 selection a year ago, played in the season opener against FCS James Madison at center, a position he hadn’t played since high school. Against Missouri, Sills was back at right guard. Chase Behrndt, who had moved to center in the spring, was at right guard for the opener and returned to center against Missouri.

Left tackle Colton McKivitz, a three-year starter, played right tackle last season. Left guard Michael Brown was redshirted a year ago. Right tackle Kelby Wickline had two starts last year.

Brown said the line’s struggles are “an indication that the guys behind them have to get better.”

The starters “didn’t necessarily play great, but nobody behind them has shown they’re ready to play,” Brown said. “That’s an issue we have, and it’s been exposed the last two weeks. We’ve got to get those guys better.”

West Virginia has scored just three touchdowns. The Mountaineers’ 27 combined points over the first two games are their fewest since 2013, when they finished 4-8.

A running game that combined for more than 1,900 yards last season has 64 total yards, ranking dead last in the Bowl Subdivision with 1.1 yard per carry. Much of that falls on the blocking.

“I just know it was bad,” said offensive line coach Matt Moore. “I don’t know exactly what it was, but it was bad, whether it was miscommunication, whether it was guys trying too hard and falling down. I don’t know. At this point you’ve just got to keep working. We’ll get to that point, but it’s never easy getting there.”

Austin Kendall, a graduate transfer from Oklahoma who won the starting quarterback job over three others, was intercepted twice against the Tigers and has yet to look consistently comfortable in two games.

“It’s tough to evaluate, honestly,” Brown said. “He got hit, I think, eight times in the first three series. There were times when he threw the ball really well. I thought he showed courage by staying in the pocket and continued delivering the ball. His decision making has got to be better. He’s got to do a better job with his eyes. So I think there’s room for improvement by him. But we’ve got to play better around him.”

Categories: Sports | WVU
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.