ShareThis Page
Super Bowl wasn’t super boring to Penguins coach Mike Sullivan | TribLIVE.com
Penguins/NHL

Super Bowl wasn’t super boring to Penguins coach Mike Sullivan

Jonathan Bombulie
| Monday, February 4, 2019 1:30 a.m
711169_web1_AP_18336131574994
AP
Pittsburgh Penguins head coach Mike Sullivan, left rear, talks with referee Brian Pochmara (16) with assistant coach Mark Recchi listening during the first period of an NHL hockey game against the Philadelphia Flyers in Pittsburgh, Saturday, Dec. 1, 2018.

Complaints were rampant on social media. Television ratings were not good.

The average sports fan was not particularly enamored with the entertainment value of the New England Patriots’ 13-3 victory over the Los Angeles Rams in Sunday’s Super Bowl.

Pittsburgh Penguins coach Mike Sullivan is apparently not an average sports fan. He loved every minute of the defensive struggle, and not just because he’s a Boston-area native and Patriots fan.

Sullivan deeply appreciated the game of chess played between the team’s coaching staffs and players.

“I thought it was terrific. I really did,” Sullivan said. “It’s a different challenge. Whenever I watch another sport, I try to draw the correlation to our sport because there’s lessons to be learned. You have to tip your hat to both teams. I thought they showed so much resolve and discipline in not making the big mistake or just taking what your opponent gives you. It’s not unlike winning a hockey game 1-0 or 2-1. I think we can all learn something from that.”

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.


Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at jbombulie@tribweb.com or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.


Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan by email at jbombulie@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.