ShareThis Page
Tim Benz: Cleveland’s Kareem Hunt signing proves trade market exists for Antonio Brown | TribLIVE.com
Tim Benz, Columnist

Tim Benz: Cleveland’s Kareem Hunt signing proves trade market exists for Antonio Brown

Tim Benz
| Tuesday, February 12, 2019 6:32 a.m
740263_web1_HuntBrown
AP photo
The Cleveland Browns’ signing of embattled running back Kareem Hunt proves there’s a market out there for embattled reciever Antonio Brown.

The KDKA “Sports Showdown” on Sunday featured quite a debate regarding the notion of the Pittsburgh Steelers trading receiver Antonio Brown.

I pointed out that Martavis Bryant, a troubled receiver with a record of suspension, commanded a third-round pick in return during draft weekend last year. Therefore, I believe a vastly superior player such as Brown should be able to yield at least a second-round pick this spring.

I stand by this belief despite the threat of suspension from the NFL based on a recent police investigation into a domestic matter at Brown’s home in Florida.

My opinion was not universally well-received.

Others on the panel, understandably, advanced the opinion that Brown wouldn’t be desirable given the prospect of an NFL investigation and the potential of a suspension.

Many who share this view do so based on the premise that teams are much more socially conscious these days and operate in a more politically sensitive manner in the wake of the Ray Rice fallout in Baltimore.

For instance, look at the 49ers and how they got rid of Reuben Fos…

What? Wait. The Browns signed who?

Oh!?

Oh.

Yup. Cleveland signed Kareem Hunt. That Kareem Hunt. The same guy who the Chiefs released during the 2018 campaign despite his status as a likely Pro Bowler in a potential Super Bowl season.

Why? Because video was discovered of him pushing and kicking a woman in February 2018.

Like Brown, Hunt wasn’t arrested or charged. The league hasn’t acted on this matter yet, but he is back on the commissioner’s exempt list, which means he cannot participate in football activities and could still face suspension.

And that was my point. Teams aren’t afraid to take on these risks anymore.

In terms of football exclusively:

• In 2010, Ben Roethlisberger was suspended four games in the wake of multiple sexual assault allegations that went uncharged. The Steelers went to the Super Bowl.

• In 2016, Tom Brady got suspended four games for Deflategate. The Patriots won the Super Bowl with him as the MVP.

• In 2016, Le’Veon Bell was suspended three games for marijuana violations. The Steelers went to the AFC championship game.

• In 2018, Julian Edelman was suspended four games for a banned substance. The Patriots won the Super Bowl with him as the MVP.

Let’s even take a look beyond the Xs and Os. I was appalled that the Steelers signed Michael Vick despite his dog-fighting history. But how many fans really stayed away from Heinz Field?

Dallas still has a massive national fan base despite Ezekiel Elliott’s presence on the roster. He was suspended six games because of domestic violence-related incidents.

Most of the angst I see from Washington fans is about Alex Smith’s leg instead of Reuben Foster’s history with drug issues, weapons charges and domestic violence.

And when is the last time a Kansas City fan booed Tyreek Hill? A police report stated he choked a girlfriend in 2015. The Chiefs drafted him anyway.

I’ll grant that Antonio Brown is different in one respect. The idea of trading for Brown means you are bringing on someone else’s problem and someone else’s contract. Kansas City drafted Hill. Foster and Hunt were released. The other players were established stars on their original teams.

In the case of Brown, Team X would be absorbing his baggage and $42 million deal over the next three years.

Organizations that stay away from Brown would likely do so because of what he might do. Not what he has done.

Brown’s recent erratic behavior — the Florida incidents, land-speed records on McKnight Road, disappearing acts during game weeks, bleached facial hair — may be more of a red flag for what is to come as opposed to the blights already on his resume.

I don’t expect those issues to be an overwhelming deterrent. Bidders will still be out there for Brown.

As Cleveland just proved:

• It only takes one franchise to be a buyer.

• Society’s collective memory is only as long as its last trend on Twitter.

• Talent trumps all.

A trade market will still exist for Brown if the Steelers are so inclined.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at tbenz@tribweb.com or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

Categories: Sports | Tim Benz Columns
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.