ShareThis Page
Tim Benz: Emmanuel Sanders joins party of bashing Kevin Colbert, Steelers | TribLIVE.com
Tim Benz, Columnist

Tim Benz: Emmanuel Sanders joins party of bashing Kevin Colbert, Steelers

Tim Benz
930449_web1_Emmanuel-Sanders
Broncos receiver Emmanuel Sanders eludes Steelers defenders to score on a touchdown reception during the first quarter Sunday Dec. 20, 2015, at Heinz Field.

The latest ex-Steeler to pile on the franchise is current Broncos wide receiver Emmanuel Sanders.

Last week, Sanders told 104.3 “The Fan” in Denver about how he left the Steelers.

“The Steelers offered me a crappy deal,” Sanders told the radio station. “They offered me three years, $9 million, $1 million guaranteed.

“I went into Kevin Colbert’s office and said, ‘I don’t want to take the deal.’ He looks at me and he goes, ‘Who do you think you are, Antonio Brown?’ I wanted to say, ‘F-you.’ I’ll never forget that.”

Sanders ended up signing a three-year, $15 million deal with the Broncos. He is just the latest ex-Steeler to kick the team while it is down because it has suddenly become chic to do so.

Brown always talked about how great of a relationship he had with his “Wifi” partner Ben Roethlisberger. Then he wanted to force himself out of town to get a new contract, and suddenly Roethlisberger “had an owner’s mentality” and was a bad teammate because he never invited Brown to his house.



On the NFL Network, James Jones’ mouth moved. But it was Morgan Burnett’s words that could be heard complaining as he tried to leverage himself out after one useless season in Black and Gold.

Le’Veon Bell was away from the team for more than a year and never made a peep about any problems he had with Roethlisberger or Tomlin until Brown squawked. Then, after signing with the Jets, Bell parroted some of Brown’s complaints in his puff-piece Sports Illustrated interview.

Josh Harris had five years to make his intentional fumble accusation against Roethlisberger, and he never did. Once ripping the Steelers on the way out the door became the “in” thing to do, suddenly we heard about this significant accusation.

Sanders is no different. First of all, if that incident went down the way Sanders describes, I’m stunned we never heard such a graphic description of events before now. How come? Did Sanders need to see others act in this manner before he felt comfortable doing something similar? Sanders has always been a pretty outspoken guy. Never afraid of a microphone. Where was this juicy nugget over the last five seasons since he left Pittsburgh?

Secondly, Sanders needs to get over Brown the same way Brown needs to get over Sanders. To this day, Brown has a hang up that he was drafted three rounds after Sanders was in 2010. And Sanders has always seemed to have a bee in his bonnet about Brown getting more money.

Listen, fellas, you’re both excellent players. The NFL is plenty big for both of you.

And lastly, if Colbert genuinely did say what he did to Sanders — in the exact tone Sanders is describing — is Colbert wrong?

No. He isn’t.

Sanders has always been an exceptional pass-catcher. And he can, at least, boast about owning one Super Bowl ring. But Brown is a Hall of Famer.

Sanders is a Pro Bowler. Antonio Brown is an All-Pro.

The Steelers kept the right guy, even if it ended dreadfully. That’s reality, even if Sanders doesn’t want to admit it. And no after-the-fact piling on is going to change that.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at tbenz@tribweb.com or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.