Tim Benz: Emmanuel Sanders rips Antonio Brown, Ben Roethlisberger — and he’s mostly right | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz: Emmanuel Sanders rips Antonio Brown, Ben Roethlisberger — and he’s mostly right

Tim Benz

The latest former Steeler to chime in on the Antonio Brown situation is fellow receiver and 2010 draft classmate Emmanuel Sanders.

You know, the other “dog” in that “two dogs, one bone” scenario Mike Tomlin created in their rookie year.

Sanders — now a Denver Bronco — was on the NFL Network on Saturday. He was highly critical of Brown.

And Mike Tomlin.

And Ben Roethlisberger. Again.

When Sanders said, “it all sounds familiar,” that was telling. Sanders is basically saying that he’s seen this act from Brown before.

Plus, he’s right about sensing the end of Brown’s time here in Pittsburgh based on the fact that Art Rooney II was so upset over what took place that he actually made comments on the record.

As Sanders summed up, “When (Rooney) says something, he means it.”

Rooney is fed up and angered. He should be. Because, as Sanders put it, going AWOL for three days then having your agent try to get you into the lineup “is the ultimate disrespect to the Pittsburgh Steelers organization.”

Remember, the Steelers essentially let Sanders get to free agency because they chose to pay Brown long-term instead. You can tell that decision still resonates with Sanders.

“Antonio brought it on himself,” Sanders said. “You cannot turn your back on you brothers and the organization who gave you an opportunity to make you who you are as a football player.”

But in the same breath, Sanders played to the camera and said, “I’m here with the Broncos. So, what’s up, A.B?”

So, I guess Sanders thinks Brown is suddenly going straighten up and fly right if he were to go to Denver?

Yeah. Right. Like, A.B. would listen to Vic Fangio and Case Keenum as opposed to Tomlin and Roethlisberger.

Sanders was also on point in two other instances.

First, he criticized Tomlin for giving Brown “way too much leeway” and allowing him on the sideline during the Week 17 game in — as Sanders reminded us — “that fur coat.”

Next, he pontificated that Roethlisberger’s radio-show comments about Brown’s bad route in the end zone on the game-losing interception in Denver, as well as the corresponding remark saying he would’ve preferred to throw the ball to JuJu Smith-Schuster four times in a row, exacerbated the situation.

I agree with Sanders about that specific angle. Roethlisberger’s statements probably did anger Brown.

However, suggesting that Roethlisberger’s leadership skills are somehow to blame for Brown’s behavior is weak. That’s blame-shifting.

Granted, Roethlisberger is guilty of blame-shifting to others at times. But Brown being a jerk is not a result of the quarterback being full of himself. Brown would still be a jerk even if his quarterback was the nicest guy in the world.

This is where Sanders lost me during the program. He then patted himself on the back for making comments in 2014 that Peyton Manning, his Broncos QB at the time, was a “better leader” than Roethlisberger. Ironically, Brown lashed back at Sanders louder than anyone after Sanders made that proclamation. Sanders then walked it back, claiming he was just trying to compliment Manning and wasn’t being critical of Roethlisberger.

On Saturday, though, Sanders was singing a different tune. It sounded like “I told you so.”

“My comments when I first became a Denver Bronco,” Sanders continued, “All that now is coming to fruition. I don’t lie. I don’t hate anybody. I just speak the truth. And that’s the truth.”

It seems Sanders only wants those comments to resonate as loudly as the mood of the moment suggests that they should.

Funny how no one was referencing Sanders’ leadership comments the week before that game in Denver when Roethlisberger plowed his way into the end zone to win a game against the Jaguars in the closing moments.

In short, everything Sanders said about Brown is right. Everything he said about Tomlin enabling Brown is right. Even some of his complaints about Roethlisberger are right.

Heck, I wrote many of the same thoughts on Big Ben last week.

But conflating Roethlisberger’s shortcomings with the circumstances of this Brown situation is wrong. A lot of people are doing it. And it needs to stop.

Roethlisberger’s personality and his leadership style are worth criticizing. However, using him as a tool to deflect blame from Brown is counterproductive and inaccurate.

Brown is at fault. Blame should end there.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.