Tim Benz: ESPN changes yellow ‘Monday Night Football’ graphic after angry complaints | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz: ESPN changes yellow ‘Monday Night Football’ graphic after angry complaints

Tim Benz
1653772_web1_ptr-MNFgraphic-01-091019
ESPN
ESPN received a lot of complaints during the "Monday Night Football" broadcast of the New Orleans Saints - Houston Texans game about a down-and-distance icon in the lower right hand corner of the screen. They quickly changed it.

Complaining your way into what you want seems to be a fashionable trend these days.

First Antonio Brown managed to get his way out of Pittsburgh. Then Oakland. Now confused “Monday Night Football” viewers are getting their way as well.

The MNF graphics crew received a lot of complaints during the New Orleans Saints – Houston Texans game about a down-and-distance icon in the lower right hand corner of the screen.

Viewers said that it looked too much like a penalty flag, and they were getting distracted.

I’ll be honest, I didn’t notice it at all. But apparently it was a huge deal to lots of viewers and ESPN decided to adjust.

Yes. Exactly. Based on the NFC Championship game, I thought Saints fans only complained when they didn’t see a flag on their screen.

Apparently, though, the complaints were so vast that the graphics gurus switched the bug to black-and-white. Not only in time for the second game between Oakland and Denver, but in time for the second half of the Saints-Texans game.

Thank God. I don’t know how else I could’ve continued watching football.

Geez. If angry tweeting impacted “Monday Night Football” decision making so directly, how did Jason Witten make it through a whole year before going back to the Dallas Cowboys?

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.