Tim Benz: Feel no shame; wallow in Antonio Brown’s self-imposed misfortune | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz: Feel no shame; wallow in Antonio Brown’s self-imposed misfortune

Tim Benz
New England Patriots wide receiver Antonio Brown puts on his shoes during practice Sept. 18, 2019, in Foxborough, Mass.

This was too easy. I almost feel guilty about playing the “I told you so” card.


Yeah, predicting Antonio Brown’s self-created demise in New England wasn’t exactly a stroke of genius. Especially based on how his tenures in Oakland and Pittsburgh ended.

Plus, as I wrote, technically, Brown’s time with the Patriots went better than it did with the Raiders. At least he got into a game and scored.

Behold. Video proof.

Screen-shot that for evidence. Because the NFL may try to destroy the video.

They have some experience in that area, you know.

The internet’s reaction to Brown’s release from New England was spectacular.

Am I wallowing in Brown’s misfortune?

Yes. Yes, I am.

Do I feel guilty for doing so? No, absolutely not. Because is it really misfortune when the reasons for Brown’s collapse are completely self-inflicted?

I don’t care if 2019 turns out to be a rotten season in Pittsburgh. Any disappointment I may feel will be largely offset by my joy of seeing Brown implode.

Even if the Steelers go 0-16.

OK, 1-15. They do play the Dolphins, after all.

Let’s take the recent allegations of sexual misconduct against Brown out of the discussion. Let the legal proceedings determine his guilt or innocence.

But the alleged menacing texts sent by Brown to one of the women lobbing the allegations against the wide receiver are what got him cut by New England. That’s reason enough to have some level of schadenfreude, watching someone get something they deserve.

Some say Brown is mentally ill or unstable. He could be.

Some say Brown is suffering from CTE. Maybe he is.

I’m not going to pretend to know. If Brown wants to seek help to gain answers to those questions, good. I hope that, by now, someone has made that suggestion to him.

Until then, all I do know is that Brown has done nothing but repeatedly portray himself as a loathsome, arrogant, irresponsible jerk.

Foxborough is deemed to be the last bastion of professionalism in the NFL. Its reputation is that of a rare oasis for structure and discipline put forth by the head coach and willingly embraced by the players.

If you go there damaged, you come out fixed. And usually with rings.

Yet not even the Patriots could fix Brown. His personality is one of irreparable narcissism that renders him utterly uncoachable and unemployable.

Will someone else sign Brown? Probably. Eventually a contender will lose a good wide receiver to injury. The team will get desperate. Brown will insist he has been rehabilitated. And he’ll get signed.

If the NFL allows it. That’s not a given.

Maybe A.B. will wind up in the XFL and say “he won.” Why not? That’s essentially what Le’Veon Bell did this week when discussing his surprisingly undervalued signing with the New York Jets.

Until that happens, though, I’ll be interested to see how Brown will handle his biggest challenge to date — irrelevance.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.