Tim Benz: First airing of grievances is deep after Steelers debacle vs. Patriots | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz: First airing of grievances is deep after Steelers debacle vs. Patriots

Tim Benz
1649106_web1_1647301-c646a4070311443981e6909ef5c11412
AP
New England Patriots wide receiver Phillip Dorsett catches a pass in front of Pittsburgh Steelers defensive back Kameron Kelly, that he ran in for a touchdown in the second half, Sunday, Sept. 8, 2019, in Foxborough, Mass.

We pick up where we left off in 2018 at Breakfast With Benz. Whenever the Pittsburgh Steelers lose — and even sometimes when they win — we post our “Airing of Grievances.”

It was easier than ever to construct after Sunday’s season-opening 33-3 loss to the New England Patriots.

Well, maybe not as easy as it was to do after the loss in Oakland last year. But close.

At least, Sunday night, the X-ray machine never came into play.

Although, it would’ve been wise to use on Donte Moncrief’s hands.

More on that later.

Before we get to the specifics, what a debacle, huh? I’m really glad to hear that the Steelers have a wonderfully harmonious locker room this year. But that won’t last if they play like that every week.

Wow! That was bad. Midway through the third quarter, I was thinking that Aaron Boone’s mercy-rule idea was a stroke of brilliance.

I guess the Patriots aren’t “on their last legs” after all. The Pirates have a better chance of sweeping the Yankees in a 162-game series than the Steelers do of ever beating Tom Brady in Foxborough.

But don’t worry, NFL. The Pats will get a stiffer test next week when they play… um, the Dolphins?

OK, let’s get to the venting.


Donte Moncrief

Or let’s call him by his real name: Football Brassard.

Every time Ben Roethlisberger threw toward Moncrief, something bad happened. How many did he drop? Three? Four? Whenever Roethlisberger targeted him, I thought he was throwing into a blackhole.

It raised this question on Twitter.

I don’t know. But both of his hands were bothering me.

Even throws intended for Moncrief that he didn’t drop somehow went awry. He wasn’t open. It got deflected. Roethlisberger misfired. Something.

That’s who is supposed to be the No. 2 receiver now that JuJu Smith-Schuster got elevated to No. 1?

Three catches for 7 yards on 10 targets. Ugh.

Meanwhile, now that Antonio Brown is in New England, they’ve got Josh Gordon as a No. 3 and Phillip Dorsett as a No. 4.

How did those guys look last night?


Vance McDonald

Where was he? For three-and-a-half quarters, I thought he missed the team plane.

The tight end ended up with only 2 catches for 40 yards. They happened in garbage time.

Although, in this game, garbage time began after the coin flip.

This is a season where McDonald is supposed to emerge as a major receiving threat. So I don’t know what happened Sunday.

I’m not sure if I should blame him for not getting open. Roethlisberger for not targeting him. Or the game plan for not incorporating him.

Tell you what, until we hear otherwise, let’s just say all of the above.


Injuries

Maurkice Pouncey, T.J. Watt, and JuJu Smith-Schuster all left the game after getting hurt. Those injuries appeared to happen late, when the game was already well in hand for New England.

Even after those warning shots, Roethlisberger was still in there, getting hit in the final seconds of the game.

Why? It was over. Get those guys off the field.

I joked on Twitter that the starters should be left in the game because they deserved the punishment.

But coach Mike Tomlin actually doing it? Now that was a joke.


That third-and-1

You know the one I mean. Midway through the second quarter, 7:46 left. On a third-and-1, Roethlisberger pitched the ball wide to James Conner and he lost 4 yards.

I hate that play. I hate it so much.

That was a Todd Haley special. It appears to have resurfaced.

There is nothing I understand less than the concept of pitching the ball backward 6 yards in an effort to gain 3 feet forward.

But the Steelers seem to love it.

Why does Roosevelt Nix have a roster spot if you don’t use him there? Or at the goal line instead of throwing a fade to “Football Brassard?”


The field goal

Was Tomlin channeling his inner Bill Cowher? I felt like we were watching the 2004 AFC Championship Game.

Down 20-0, the Steelers drove into the red zone and stalled on fourth-and-goal at the one-yard line.

After the fade to “Football Brassard.”

So Tomlin elected to kick a field goal. I assume to avoid a shutout or to get Chris Boswell his confidence back or… something.

That was the deepest penetration the Steelers had to that point (and, ultimately, would have all night). They needed seven points there. Not three.

And then they needed 30 more after that.

Aside from that, it was a great night in Foxborough.

As usual.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.