Tim Benz: How Alison Riske nearly seized opportunity at Wimbledon | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World Sports

Tim Benz: How Alison Riske nearly seized opportunity at Wimbledon

Tim Benz
1389987_web1_1389389-5fbb4481cd4e4baab4f2ee512ad380b1
Alison Riske gestures during a women’s quarterfinal match against Serena Williams at Wimbledon on Tuesday, July 9, 2019.

There was no raising of the Jolly Roger at Wimbledon’s Centre Court. No one waved a Terrible Towel. And “Renegade” was never played.

London ain’t ready for that much Pittsburgh n’at, anyway.

Peters Township product Alison Riske gave it her best against Serena Williams during the Wimbledon quarterfinals. But the seven-time Wimbledon champion was too much to handle on Tuesday, beating Riske 6-4, 4-6, 6-3.

The former WPIAL standout had her chances, but Williams — seeking a 24th major crown — had the answers.

Here’s a “Take 5” on how Serena swatted away any chance of Primanti Bros. at “Breakfast at Wimbledon” over championship weekend.


1. The serve: It was a significant advantage for Williams. She had 19 aces to Riske’s one. The most emphatic was a hammer on the last point to close out the match in style. Williams committed two double faults along the way.

2. Riske’s returns: Once Riske got the ball in play, she was highly competitive. In fact, 27 games into the match, as the ESPN crew pointed out, Williams had 17 aces and just 15 other points off her first serve.

So once Riske was able to start a rally, she did an exemplary job hanging with one of the best to ever play the game.

3. The turning point: Riske pulled even at 3-3 in the third set. At that moment, it was anyone’s match.

Williams took a long moment to gather herself, wrapped her hair upright, looked down at the grass and began her service game.

On the first point, she won a 10-stroke baseline exchange against Riske, seemingly hitting every shot with more and more force. The exchange appeared to energize Williams, and she ramped it up from there.

Williams made Riske chase with more big forehands and put her away at the net on the next point, then smoked an ace and a service winner to grab the game at love.

4. The backbreaking game: Williams carried that momentum into the eighth game of the third set. It was the highlight of the match.

It lasted 11 points and almost eight minutes. Riske fought off three break points but wilted at the end of the game.

By the middle of the 10-stroke duel on the 10th point of the frame, Riske had Williams set up with an overhead to put the rally to bed. But she didn’t get enough steam on the slam. Williams kept the ball alive and eventually won the point.

Perhaps rattled, Riske then double-faulted to give Williams the game. Williams followed by serving out the match to end the third set.

5. Early opportunity lost: Riske broke Williams’ serve twice in the first set, but still couldn’t win it. Riske went up 2-1 on a break, and again 4-3. But Williams answered, and closed the set strong, winning the last three games and taking it 6-4.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.