Tim Benz: Jets, Dolphins are historic underdogs vs. Patriots, Cowboys | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz: Jets, Dolphins are historic underdogs vs. Patriots, Cowboys

Tim Benz
Le’Veon Bell’s New York Jets and Ryan Fitzpatrick’s Miami Dolphins are historic underdogs going into their Week 3 matchups against the New England Patriots and Dallas Cowboys, respectively.

Searching for a sure thing in your NFL survivor pool?

This week, it should be smooth sailing, especially if you haven’t used the New England Patriots yet. And if you have, this could be a wise week to burn the Dallas Cowboys.

Because this Sunday, the Patriots and Cowboys are two of the biggest favorites in the history of the National Football League.

New England opened up as a 22.5-point favorite over the New York Jets. The Patriots look unbeatable. The Jets look terrible. And New York is down to its third-string quarterback, Luke Falk.

Meanwhile, Dallas is a 21.5-point favorite over the Miami Dolphins. Miami could be the worst NFL team ever assembled. And that was underscored Monday when they traded away last year’s first-round pick, Minkah Fitzpatrick.

Where did he wind up, again?

Keep in mind, the Dolphins just lost 43-0 at home to the Patriots. Yet, they are still considered a slightly better bet than the Jets are to win in Foxborough.

You know what? I can’t fault the oddsmakers there.

If you are someone who — help me out, Brent Musberger — ”listens to the guys in the desert,” this is nearly unprecedented territory.

We haven’t seen a weekend with two underdogs of 21-plus points since 1987. And those were strike games where the favorites — the San Francisco 49ers and Cowboys — had more regular players cross the picket lines.

The underdogs — Atlanta and Philadelphia — had fewer.

In both cases, the underdog Falcons and Eagles covered the spread. The last time that happened in a non-strike year was 1977.

David Purdum did that research for ESPN.com. He also wrote that “only 35 times has a team been favored by 21 points or more since 1966. … Teams favored by 21 or more are 35-0 straight-up but only 11-22-2 against the spread.”

So, in other words, expecting New England or the Cowboys to win is pretty much a lock. But laying the points could cost you money.

Here’s the problem, according to Foxbet.com: You have to risk $5,000 to win $100 if you are betting on the Patriots straight up, without the spread. And if you are betting on the Cowboys, it’s $3,300 to win $100.

A lot of risk, very little return. As you should expect.

Somehow, I feel like it’s totally safe, though.

If you are interested in the Le’Veon Bell vs. Antonio Brown matchup in the Patriots-Jets game, on that site, the odds of Bell breaking 100 yards rushing are set at +230. Meanwhile, Brown’s line is at +270 to hit 106 receiving.

Eh, I’d suggest finding an over-under somewhere on both of those props and bet against both ex-Steelers.

It’ll be a rare time when rooting for the under is more fun.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.