ShareThis Page
Tim Benz, Joe Rutter break down Steelers’ decision not to tag Le’Veon Bell | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz, Joe Rutter break down Steelers’ decision not to tag Le’Veon Bell

Tim Benz
781187_web1_683130-29094dd0776a416db656c8ae21d7457b
AP
In this Nov. 8, 2018, file photo, a Pittsburgh Steelers fan holds a Le’Veon Bell jersey during the second half against the Carolina Panthers.

Tribune Review Steelers beat writer Joe Rutter joins me for our Thursday Sided.co podcast.

Joe was at Kevin Colbert’s press conference Wednesday. We talk about his decision to let Le’Veon Bell hit the free agent market. Why did he give up the transition tag option?

Also, we get into Colbert’s comments about Antonio Brown’s trade fate. It doesn’t sound like a move to ship Brown out of town is a done deal.


LISTEN: Breaking down why Steelers won’t use transition tag on Le’Veon Bell


The Steelers general manager also defended quarterback Ben Roethlisberger. Maybe too much?

Plus he gave us some clues about the futures of Bud Dupree and Chris Boswell.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.