Tim Benz, Kevin Gorman break down Steelers’ Day 2 draft picks | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz, Kevin Gorman break down Steelers’ Day 2 draft picks

Tim Benz
Toledo wide receiver Diontae Johnson celebrates a touchdown he scored against Akron in the 2017 MAC championship game.

After trading up to get Devin Bush in Round 1 of the NFL draft on Thursday, Day 2 was a lot more calm at Steelers headquarters.

The organization stayed locked in at picks 66 and 83 in the third round. Lots of cornerbacks and wide receivers came tumbling off the board. But the Steelers drafted those positions anyway, as they remain areas of need.

Ironically, the thre positions the Steelers addressed in free agency are the ones they’ve also addressed in the draft: inside linebacker, corner back, and wide receiver.

The wide receiver who was drafted is Diontae Johnson from Toledo. He’s got a lot of similarities to Antonio Brown in terms of size, resume, versatility, and scouting reports.

Let’s see if his personality is a little better.

Justin Layne was the second pick of the third round. He’s a corner from Michigan State with size. Layne is 6-foot-2 and a converted wide receiver with 4.45 speed.

Kevin Gorman and I recap the two picks.

LISTEN: Benz, Gorman break down Steelers’ Day 2 picks

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.