Tim Benz, Kevin Gorman discuss whether Steelers would trade Mike Tomlin | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz, Kevin Gorman discuss whether Steelers would trade Mike Tomlin

Tim Benz
Washington Redskins owner Daniel Snyder walks across the field before an NFL football game against the St. Louis Rams in Landover, Md., Sunday, Dec. 7, 2014.

Kevin Gorman and I wrap up Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin’s press conference at the UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.

Boy, there’s a lot of meat on the bone this week, even though the season appears to have slipped through Tomlin’s fingers.

* If the Washington Redskins really want Tomlin as their new coach next year, will the Steelers entertain an offer? I think they should. Kevin gives his thoughts.

* Jaylen Samuels and Steven Nelson are now hurt. So we talk about the notion of seeing more playing time for Benny Snell Jr. and maybe Artie Burns, too.

* Tomlin hinted that he’s going to keep the game plan tight for quarterback Devlin Hodges. That’s a poor idea in my opinion. Let’s see if Kevin agrees.

* Kevin seems to think all the losing is starting to wear on Tomlin’s psyche and that cracks are showing.

* And we discuss medical carts, yellow paint and red barns.

Hear all the conversation in today’s podcast.

LISTEN: Tim Benz and Kevin Gorman cover a lot of Steelers’ news including rumors about Mike Tomlin to Redskins, player injuries, the game plan for Devlin Hodges and what all the losses doing to Tomlin

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.