ShareThis Page
Tim Benz: Le’Veon Bell’s signing may have helped cause Jets firings | TribLIVE.com
Tim Benz, Columnist

Tim Benz: Le’Veon Bell’s signing may have helped cause Jets firings

Tim Benz
1161764_web1_LeVeonBell1
newyorkjets.com
Le’Veon Bell

Le’Veon Bell is already causing problems for the New York Jets.

And he hasn’t even practiced with the team yet!

This time, it’s not Bell’s fault, really. You can’t blame “Juice” for a drug violation, a tardy appearance at a walk-through, a rap diss or a social media faux pas. The only thing Bell did wrong was sign the best deal offered to him.

Well, unless you count the better deal he should’ve signed to stay in Pittsburgh.

But we don’t need to go down that road again.

No, this time Bell reportedly is only at fault for accepting a contract offer he liked from the Jets. That offer seems to be part of a rift within the Jets power structure that led to Wednesday’s front-office firings.

In case you missed the news, the Jets fired general manager Mike Maccagnan and vice president of player personnel Brian Heimerdinger. Coach Adam Gase will take over as acting GM. The New York Daily News reported Gase would like Eagles vice president of player personnel Joe Douglas to take over the job on a full-time basis.

Daily News Jets beat writer Manish Mehta tweeted that a disagreement over Bell’s signing was a major reason there was a rift between Maccagnan and Gase.

I’d say $35 million guaranteed is a lot of money, even if it isn’t as much as Bell thought he’d get at this point last year.

So it appears Gase lost the battle regarding the signing of Bell. But he must have won the power struggle over who makes decisions moving forward.

“Mike helped to execute the strategic vision of the organization during the last four seasons and especially the last few months,” Jets Chairman and CEO Christopher Johnson said in a statement to the media. “However I came to the decision to make a change after much thought and careful assessment of what would be in the best long-term interests of the New York Jets.”

Did Bell’s absence from workouts and lingering concerns about his weight factor into Johnson’s decision to remove Maccagnan? That’s to be determined.

What’s really going to be interesting to watch is how Bell and Gase relate. Bell has surely heard that within the debate of who wanted him, the guy who did is gone.

And the guy who allegedly didn’t—his coach—is still part of the organization.

Gase and Johnson can spin this however they want. But their track record is already smudged. Gase denied a rift between Maccagnan and himself as recently as last week. And in his story, Mehta claims that Johnson refuted a belief that Maccagnan would be fired after the draft.

As a result, it’ll take more than a grain of salt to believe Gase and Johnson now that Maccagnan is out. Hopefully, Maccagnan will shed some light on the details at some point.

I also hope that Bell turns this perceived slight from Gase into a poorly auto-tuned rap clap back. In fact, I expect that to happen before his first full practice.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.