Tim Benz, Mark Madden debate hit on Steelers QB Mason Rudolph, JuJu Smith-Schuster’s fumble | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Tim Benz, Mark Madden debate hit on Steelers QB Mason Rudolph, JuJu Smith-Schuster’s fumble

1773652_web1_AP19279852232452
AP
Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster tries to avoid Baltimore Ravens cornerback Marlon Humphrey on Sunday, Oct. 6, 2019, at Heinz Field.

The players who have stepped into Antonio Brown’s and Le’Veon Bell’s shoes have fumbled things away for the Pittsburgh Steelers.

Tim Benz and Mark Madden discuss the fumbling tendencies of JuJu Smith-Schuster and James Conner in light of the Steelers’ loss to the Ravens on Sunday — and Smith-Schuster’s overtime fumble.

The guys also address the play-calling and the failure of the Steelers offense to capitalize on turnovers … again.

They also discuss the hit by Earl Thomas that knocked out quarterback Mason Rudolph and what the future holds for the Steelers at quarterback going forward this season.

Did anyone hear a duck?

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.