Tim Benz, Mark Madden discuss if Steelers stick with Devlin Hodges after win against Chargers | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz, Mark Madden discuss if Steelers stick with Devlin Hodges after win against Chargers

1805305_web1_1805305-8fd1776af15d49148419e00bfedc3f51
AP
Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Devlin Hodges passes during the first half of an NFL football game against the Los Angeles Chargers, Sunday, Oct. 13, 2019, in Carson, Calif.
1805305_web1_1805305-b9d14d9550ac49c4a53cc544e5bf5e52
AP
Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Devlin Hodges speaks during a news conference after an NFL football game against the Los Angeles Chargers, Sunday, Oct. 13, 2019, in Carson, Calif.
1805305_web1_1805305-dab01280ffc74a94ba2a2e1e03aac301
AP
Los Angeles Chargers quarterback Philip Rivers, left, and Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Devlin Hodges greet each other after an NFL football game, Sunday, Oct. 13, 2019, in Carson, Calif.
1805305_web1_f91e10a4c9c84764bc3be91e271eeeb3-f91e10a4c9c84764bc3be91e271eeeb3-0
AP
Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Devlin Hodges, left, and Los Angeles Chargers quarterback Philip Rivers greet each other after an NFL football game, Sunday, Oct. 13, 2019, in Carson, Calif.

Mark Madden (right off a plane from Las Vegas) and Tim Benz break down the Pittsburgh Steelers 24-17 win over the Los Angeles Chargers Sunday night.

The TribLIVE columnists got together Monday morning on Facebook Live to discuss the win. The guys say the play of the Steelers defense and the strong running game of James Conner and Benny Snell helped the team to the win. Devlin “Duck” Hodges did ok, too. So will the Steelers go with the “hot hand”? The guys don’t think so, but you can’t be sure this year.

And as a bonus Madden and Benz talk about the Penguins’ two weekend wins.

Check out the whole segment below.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.