Tim Benz, Mark Madden discuss Jordan Lyles trade, Joe Haden contract | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz, Mark Madden discuss Jordan Lyles trade, Joe Haden contract

Tim Benz
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Steelers’ Joe Haden arrives to camp Thursday, July 25, 2019 at Saint Vincent College.

I’m moving this week.

So I took Monday off. Eventually, I emerged from a sea of boxes, cable wires, duffel bags and clothes I should’ve thrown away a long time ago to record Madden Monday.

Sorry it’s a day late.

Mark Madden and I caught up in his studio at WXDX-FM after his Monday night show. We talk about the Jordan Lyles trade and what else may be coming down the line for the Pirates before the trade deadline Wednesday.

We also talk tons of Steelers football, particularly about JuJu Smith-Schuster, and the silliness of overreaction to benign training camp details from Saint Vincent College.

Joe Haden’s contract situation is getting tense. The Benny Snell-James Conner dynamic could be interesting. Is Ola Adeniyi worth the hype? Or is he just a camp darling?


Plus, we tell you why 2021 may be the most interesting year in Pittsburgh sports history.

Also, gender reveals are stupid and so are head tattoos.

And, we get into the important topics of National Chicken Wing Day and that Showtime Roger Ailes show, “The Loudest Voice,” with Russell Crowe.

LISTEN: Benz, Madden on Jordan Lyles, Joe Haden, more

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.