Tim Benz, Mark Madden discuss Mario Lemieux memories, Pirates problems, state of Steelers | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz, Mark Madden discuss Mario Lemieux memories, Pirates problems, state of Steelers

Tim Benz
1272861_web1_ptr-maddenmonday-061119
Getty Images
Mario Lemieux skates during a game during his rookie season.

Well, what do you know? 

It’s a “Madden Monday” podcast … on a Monday!

Will wonders never cease?

Between holidays, vacation days and our mutually busy concert schedule, Mark Madden and I haven’t been able to connect on a Monday for the past few weeks, pushing our usual post back to Tuesdays. But we are back on schedule now.

This week, Mark and I begin by talking about the many concerns of the Pirates. They include the bullpen, the starting depth, and what to do with the outfield now that Corey Dickerson has returned.


LISTEN: Mario memories, Pirates problems, state of Steelers

There is some Steelers talk, too, particularly the notion that the Steelers and Browns can both be better atop the AFC North. Is that possible? Or is the Browns hype too much?

Perhaps better asked in Pittsburgh, are we too hopeful that the Steelers will be improved by the absence of their distracting players?

We don’t leave out the Penguins either. Mark and I flash back back 35 years to the day Mario Lemieux was drafted, and we get into the latest Phil Kessel trade talk.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.