ShareThis Page
Tim Benz, Mark Madden discuss Penguins | TribLIVE.com
Tim Benz, Columnist

Tim Benz, Mark Madden discuss Penguins

Tim Benz
| Monday, February 11, 2019 6:37 a.m
736306_web1_722710-d3c66438209347149122470a9620d2db
Chris O’Meara/AP
Pittsburgh Penguins right wing Patric Hornqvist (72) and Tampa Bay Lightning defenseman Erik Cernak (81) battle along the boards during the first period of an NHL hockey game Saturday, Feb. 9, 2019, in Tampa, Fla.

In this week’s Madden Monday, Mark Madden of 105.9 the X joins me to talk about the recent woes of the Pens.

Among the topics there: shorthanded goals allowed, goaltending, scoring, injuries, and the lack of a midseason hot streak.

Aside from that they are fine.

Then we get the to the conundrums about the Le’veon Bell and Antonio Brown. In particular, we dwell on the Bell transition tag talk and Brown’s domestic issue.

Then we dive into the designated hitter debate and Greta Van Fleet winning a Grammy.

__________________

LISTEN: Tim Benz, Mark Madden discuss what’s ailing the Penguins


Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at tbenz@tribweb.com or via Twitter @TimBenzPGH. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.


Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at tbenz@tribweb.com or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

Categories: Sports | Tim Benz Columns
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.