Tim Benz, Mark Madden recap Steelers’ ugly loss to Patriots | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz, Mark Madden recap Steelers’ ugly loss to Patriots

Tim Benz
New England Patriots wide receiver Phillip Dorsett catches a touchdown pass in front of Pittsburgh Steelers cornerback Mike Hilton in the first half, Sunday, Sept. 8, 2019, in Foxborough, Mass.

It’s time for this week’s “Madden Monday” with Mark Madden of 105.9 the X.

And it’s ugly.

How could it be anything else after that disaster in New England?

The Steelers lost to the Patriots 33-3. The passing game was awful. The run game was non-existent. The play calling was atrocious.

On defense, they couldn’t cover. And when they did, they couldn’t tackle. And there was no pressure on Tom Brady at all.

Also, a bunch of important guys got banged up on top of everything else.

The Steelers were gutless, dumb, and unprepared.

Have we painted a fair enough picture? If not, watch this play.

There. I just saved you three hours watching on your DVR if you missed the game live. That pretty much summed it up.

Mark and I also talk about the Antonio Brown signing by the Patriots, the impressive showing by Baltimore, and Cleveland’s Week 1 train wreck.

And, if you want more, Mark and I will be streaming live on the TribLive Facebook page at 9:30 a.m. Monday.

LISTEN: Tim Benz and Mark Madden say no Steelers player played well in loss to the Patriots. And wonder how Antonio Brown will fit in with Pats

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.