Tim Benz, Mark Madden sound off on Pirates, Antonio Brown | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz, Mark Madden sound off on Pirates, Antonio Brown

Tim Benz
1530480_web1_1472324-16515e4171ef48bc8e106fb9f4789b78
AP Photo
Pittsburgh Pirates manager Clint Hurdle walks through the dugout in the second inning of a baseball game against the Cincinnati Reds, Monday, July 29, 2019, in Cincinnati. (AP Photo/John Minchillo)

In this edition of “Madden Monday,” Mark Madden and I try to figure out what the Pirates will do in terms of cleaning out the management structure.

Mark shares my skepticism that Bob Nutting will act harshly. We both expect a few minor scapegoats, and that’s it.

Then we recap preseason Game 1 for the Steelers. I was a huge fan of what I saw from Devin Bush and James Washington.

We’ll see if Mark had any other favorite players from the game.

Plus, Mark and I analyze the comedy show in Oakland that is the Antonio Brown saga. And, boy, is it a saga already. Frozen feet. Missed practices. Helmet protests. Could we have expected anything less?

Le’Veon Bell has a new rap video out. Mark tells us if he approves.

Other topics? O.J. comments on A.B. 1-877-KARS4KIDS is ruining America. Trish Stratus versus Charlotte. And the glory of his transcontinental flight to see Liverpool.

LISTEN: Tim Benz, Mark Madden on Pirates, Antonio Brown

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.