Tim Benz, Mark Madden talk Olli Maatta trade, Steelers running backs, Pirates quandary | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz, Mark Madden talk Olli Maatta trade, Steelers running backs, Pirates quandary

Tim Benz
1302281_web1_ptr-JRutherfordPens-061419
AP
Penguins general manager Jim Rutherford traded Olli Maatta to the Blackhawks for forward Dominik Kahun.

In this week’s “Madden Monday” podcast, Mark Madden and I discuss whether Jim Rutherford did the right thing by trading Olli Maatta to Chicago. We also investigate the quality of the return in Dominik Kahun.

Maatta took a lot of grief in Pittsburgh. We debate whether it was warranted. Another topic about the trade is how Kahun will fit in with his new club. Is he more of a Bryan Rust or a Dominik Simon?


LISTEN: Olli Maatta trade, Steelers running backs, Pirates quandary

The Pirates won a series against the Marlins, but that isn’t much to build on. The concept of trading either Starling Marte, Felipe Vazquez — or both — may be coming into focus soon.

Mark is not a fan of the direction of where we are going with instant replay in sports. So we rip on the latest twist in the ongoing saga of what the NFL wants to do with replaying pass-interference calls.

The running back situation is worth examining coming out of minicamp for the Steelers. I think it can be argued that the Steelers are messing with James Conner a little bit too much. I’ll see if Mark shares that opinion.

And I ask the question: Is it just me? Or has there actually been a lot more NBA talk in Pittsburgh this year?

And if so, why?

Top Sports Videos

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.