Tim Benz: Minkah Fitzpatrick’s Steelers debut was microcosm of debate to acquire him | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz: Minkah Fitzpatrick’s Steelers debut was microcosm of debate to acquire him

Tim Benz
1716046_web1_AP_19265823073091
AP
Pittsburgh Steelers free safety Minkah Fitzpatrick against the San Francisco 49ers during the second half of an NFL football game in Santa Clara, Calif., Sunday, Sept. 22, 2019.

If you were looking for crystallization of the entire Minkah Fitzpatrick debate, you got it in his first game as a Pittsburgh Steeler Sunday in San Francisco.

If you share my opinion about Fitzpatrick as a player, you saw all the reasons to be happy about the transaction.

He was involved in two turnovers and was disruptive to the San Francisco 49ers offense, blitzing more often than anticipated.

If you share my logic about the rationale of the trade, you saw all the reasons why it shouldn’t have been made.

Because for as good as Fitzpatrick was in his first game wearing Black and Gold, he couldn’t impact the game enough to tilt the result toward the Steelers on an afternoon when the opponent seemed to be actively trying to lose.

The 49ers were so bad that they committed five turnovers — two involving Fitzpatrick — yet still couldn’t lose to these woeful Steelers.

The 49ers ended up winning 24-20.

So the inherent conundrum of the trade manifested in its first experiment. The gifted Fitzpatrick delivered on his promised impact, and he still couldn’t help the Steelers over the top.

If what Fitzpatrick gave us is a best-case scenario individually, yet the collective result of the game didn’t change, was it wise to give the Miami Dolphins a first-round pick to acquire his services?

Granted, we’re just examining a microcosm of the argument. It’s not proof of the result one way or the other after a mere four quarters of football.

This direction is where I fear it is going, though — Fitzpatrick is a free safety who can only influence his team’s efforts toward victory so much.

Fitzpatrick is not a quarterback, or a shutdown corner, or a chaotic pass rusher, or a 1,200-yard wide receiver, or an All-Pro offensive tackle. By the nature of his position, Fitzpatrick won’t be able to influence the outcome of as many plays as the guys in those positions.

To that end, if the Steelers do end up receiving a top-10 draft pick come April 2020 — which is entirely possible at this rate — it would’ve been wise to select one of the best players at those positions as opposed to making Fitzpatrick the de facto selection in September.

Again, that’s not a criticism of Fitzpatrick’s talents. He’s excellent. Buy your No. 39 jersey now. You’ll be proud to wear it.

I’m only suggesting it may be wise to apply a baseball mentality to a football conversation in this case.

Normally, I’m not a big fan of the “WAR” statistic in baseball — wins above replacement. I think that metric is nothing but a self-fulfilling, subjective opinion wrapped in objective metric clothing.

Although, I believe that the model is valid here.

Sean Davis, Fitzpatrick’s injured predecessor at the position, was probably an average to slightly-above-average player at the position last year. That was a 9-6-1 season.

Is Fitzpatrick such a dominant force by himself that he is going to elevate the Steelers’ record more than a game?

At best. Certainly not two, right?

And if that’s not the case, would you rather have the next Jalen Ramsey, Todd Gurley, Christian McCaffrey, DeForest Buckner, Marshon Lattimore, Quenton Nelson or Patrick Mahomes instead?

All of those Pro Bowlers were drafted between the fifth and 11th pick in the drafts of 2015-18. Picks Nos. 5 through 11 were all awarded to organizations who finished with only five or six wins in 2018.

So that’s the range the Steelers are looking at unless they are above .500 the rest of this season.

Feel optimistic about that happening? I don’t. I mean, they only get to play the awful Dolphins once, you know.

This conversation will be had non-stop until April when we view “what could’ve been” for the Steelers on the draft board. That’s when those same front office folks in South Florida will be licking their chops over what talent they are about to land with the pick they grabbed from Pittsburgh.

You watch. Fitzpatrick is going to do everything possible on his own to justify the decision by Steelers general manager Kevin Colbert.

Unfortunately, the rest of the team around him this season may be so bad, it won’t help.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.