Tim Benz: Penguins’ inconsistent start leading to low-tension games | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz: Penguins’ inconsistent start leading to low-tension games

Tim Benz
Penguins defenseman Brian Dumoulin and Kris can’t get the puck from the Jets’ Blake Wheeler in the second period Tuesday, Oct. 8, 2019 at PPG Paints Arena.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Jets goaltender Connor Hellebuyck makes a save on the Penguins Jake Guentzel in the second period Tuesday, Oct. 8, 2019 at PPG Paints Arena.

This year’s Pittsburgh Penguins team certainly doesn’t seem to be one that’s high on tension.

It’ll let you beat the traffic out of the arena.

In the club’s first game, it put forth a listless effort in a flat 3-1 season-opening loss to the Buffalo Sabres.

In Game 2 Saturday, the Penguins boat raced the Columbus Blue Jackets 7-2.

Then, in Game 3 Tuesday night, Sidney Crosby scored 32 seconds into the game, only to see the team shutout for the final 59:28, en route to a 4-1 loss at home to the Winnipeg Jets.

Each game has been unique, but one consistency so far during the first week of NHL hockey in Pittsburgh is that there hasn’t been a lot of nail biting in the third period.

Just don’t look for a connecting thread as to why.

“I think up until this point, the three games have been very different in nature,” head coach Mike Sullivan said after the loss Tuesday. “The one we were the most disappointed in was Game 1. We really liked Game 2. I thought we competed hard tonight. I don’t think the score was any indication of how the game was played.”

Unfortunately for the Penguins, one pattern between the last two games has been a shortage of forwards. Nick Bjugstad and Evgeni Malkin got hurt during Saturday night’s win. The team only dressed 11 forwards Tuesday. Then Patric Hornqvist was injured early in the game, dropping the number of healthy bodies up front to 10 before the final horn for the second consecutive game.

“The forwards battled tonight,” defenseman Brian Dumoulin said. “That’s not easy playing 10 forwards. A lot of them played different roles and lines. But that’s part of the effort. I thought they worked hard. They gave us some good chances.”

In this game, the Penguins outshot the Jets 24-20, didn’t commit any penalties, and won 58% of their faceoffs.

“Tonight was a different story from Game 1,” captain Crosby said. “We made a couple mistakes that wound up in the back of our net. But besides that, we played a pretty good game.”

The one area where the Jets were discernibly better was puck management. That’s one replication of the loss on Thursday to the Sabres. The Penguins gave the puck away 10 times, as opposed to just four transgressions for Winnipeg. Two of those turnovers proved particularly costly as they resulted in response goals by the Jets after Crosby scored quickly to start the game.

On the first Jets goal of the contest, the Penguins couldn’t push the puck out of the defensive zone up the left wall, allowing a score by Ville Heinola.

On the second goal, Pittsburgh forward Zach Aston-Reese could’ve been credited with a primary assist for serving up a perfect pass to opposing winger Nickolaj Ehlers at the Penguins’ defensive blue line. Ehlers ended up ripping a shot past goaltender Matt Murray to give the Jets a 2-1 lead.

“We turned it over in some tough areas,” Crosby said. “At the start of the year you need to make those mistakes sometimes before you realize the impact.”

Well, the impact so far is leaving four of a possible six points on the table at home to start the year. In a season where every point could be crucial for the Penguins, that’s not good.

“We flipped a switch. We took it to Columbus,” Aston-Reese said. “Tonight I thought we still played well. Look at the chances-for and the stat line. We outplayed them for the most part. We just gave them too many good chances. They capitalized on them. If that goes the other way, it is 4-1 for us.”

But it didn’t. And the Penguins were playing from behind for 50 minutes of the hockey game, with the lead expanding as the night went along, including a Mark Scheifele goal that was pulled off the board following an offsides.

Otherwise, it could’ve been a 5-1 final.

So I’d be wary of the Penguins adopting last year’s Steelers mentality of #JustAFewPlaysAway after losses. The local football team fell into that trap of thinking they were closer than they were in many games during 2018. Then they looked up and realized they had six loses and a tie and were at home for the postseason.

Not that I’m complaining. I don’t need 82 nights of white-knuckle hockey tension, 60 minutes at a time. The playoffs are good enough for me in that regard.

I just hope the Penguins actually get there again this year.

Top Sports Videos

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.