Tim Benz: Pirates-Reds brawl more comical than cantankerous | TribLIVE.com
Tim Benz, Columnist

Tim Benz: Pirates-Reds brawl more comical than cantankerous

Tim Benz
1479949_web1_AP19212109169281
AP
Cincinnati Reds’ Yasiel Puig is restrained by Pittsburgh Pirates third baseman Colin Moran during the ninth inning Tuesday, July 30, 2019, in Cincinnati.

The Pirates and Reds had another skirmish in the ninth inning of Tuesday night’s 11-4 Bucs win.

But, at least, this one had some punches thrown as opposed to the chest-puffing pillow fights that occurred earlier in the season.

In case you missed it, the two teams clashed on the field after Reds pitcher Amir Garrett was ejected from the game in the top of the ninth inning.

It all started when Keone Kela went up and in on old friend Derek Dietrich — he of the extended home run trots against the Pirates.

After the game, Kela didn’t shy away from the fact that Dietrich’s history against the Pirates may have had something to do with that pitch.

“The reason I went up and in was strictly to show my intent of my pitch and to let Dietrich know that I didn’t necessarily agree with the way things went down,” Kela said. “People can say it was overdue. But this is baseball. And I felt I needed to protect my teammates and I had to do what I feel is right. Not only that, but you have to pitch in. That’s part of this game. And the day you aren’t allowed to pitch in, is the day this game forever changes.”

Then former Pirate Jared Hughes hit ex-teammate Starling Marte in retaliation and got ejected.

All that happened before the brawl in the ninth when Garrett lost his mind.

Let’s consider the comedy that occurred during the course of all this.

First of all, it’s the Reds and Pirates. And there is a lot of history there this year. This is at least the third dust up this season between the clubs.

Fourth, if you count the broadcasters.

Never before have two teams so inept fought this often. The two clubs are a combined 20 games under .500. They are, by far, the two worst teams in the NL Central.

Meow! Hiss!

Yeah. Exactly.

Then there was Garrett swinging and missing with all three punches he threw at Trevor Williams.

Boy, he sure showed the brim of Williams’ cap who was boss, huh? For a guy with nine walks in his last 9 ⅔ innings, we shouldn’t be surprised with that lack of control.

Also, in Kela’s postgame comments, he referred to Hughes as “Phil” Hughes. That’s precious. I’m not sure who should feel more insulted by that, Phil or Jared.

Then there is the fact that Kela, who started the whole thing, came out of the shower to dive back into the fight. He didn’t even know it was going on. He was in flip-flops at the time of the fracas.

Let’s factor in, as well, that Cincinnati outfielder Yasiel Puig kept the skirmish going longer than anyone. He needed to be restrained multiple times.

Puig was reportedly traded to Cleveland mid-game. Imagine what the Indians were thinking watching that.

“Great, we traded for a guy. And now he’s going to get suspended.”

Plus, Puig got traded for Trevor Bauer, who recently had a temper tantrum of his own.

Even better? Look at how some of the Reds players found out about the trade … from the fans in the outfield.

Folks, you can’t make this stuff up. It writes itself.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.