Tim Benz: If Pirates, Reds weren’t so lame, they could have a decent rivalry | TribLIVE.com
Tim Benz, Columnist

Tim Benz: If Pirates, Reds weren’t so lame, they could have a decent rivalry

Tim Benz
1226147_web1_1226147-846fb71861be489f93e81d466628a649
AP
Cincinnati Reds’ Eugenio Suarez, left, reacts after being hit by a pitch by Pittsburgh Pirates relief pitcher Clay Holmes during the ninth inning Wednesday, May 29, 2019, in Cincinnati.
1226147_web1_1226147-0394fb058bf14f269f32807f1f7e3656
AP
Cincinnati Reds manager David Bell (25) is restrained by umpire Laz Diaz, center, after being ejected by Jeff Nelson, right, following an argument over Reds’ Eugenio Suarez being hit by a pitch by Pirates’ Clay Holmes during the eighth inning Wednesday, May 29, 2019, in Cincinnati.

Given all the attention on how the Pirates may retaliate against Derek Dietrich preening after his three home runs Tuesday, tempers were a little hot Wednesday afternoon in Cincinnati.

The Pirates beat the Reds, 7-2. But it wasn’t without incident.

Pirates pitcher Clay Holmes, not exactly renowned for his control (34 strikeouts vs. 30 walks in his MLB career), hit Reds third baseman Eugenio Suarez late in the eighth inning with the Pirates leading 7-0.

Jameson Taillon broke Suarez’s thumb with a pitch last year. So he was a little touchy.

This time, X-rays were negative on Suarez’s hand.

Manager David Bell got ejected after arguing with the umpires. It appears he feels that they didn’t do enough to protect his players. Presumably, Bell was upset that Holmes wasn’t ejected or warned.

He claims the Pirates are known for throwing at batters.

The Pirates are right in the middle of the league — 16th out of 30 teams — in hit batters, with 22. The Reds are 18th with 21.

Bell also insists that Suarez was just sticking up for himself and that he was doing the same thing as a manager when he got ejected.

Suarez “protected” himself? How, exactly? By walking a quarter of the way out to the mound and saying “OK” before slinking to first base?

Yeah. That was awfully intimidating. Especially with his blonde, boy-band dye job. It looks like he combed Antonio Brown’s mustache through his hair.

Then — to be clear — Bell announced that he “protected” his player by getting ejected?

When did that occur? Did I miss it? Was it when he was having a slow-burn hissy-fit like a soccer mom at a Chardonnay lunch?

He didn’t get ejected so much as he got escorted out of the club by security at closing time.

It was almost as if the crew chief got bored and tossed him because he was taking too long to make his point.

Afterwards, Taillon got into a Twitter hissing contest with former Reds pitcher Jon Moscot.

So, to recap. Dietrich punked the Pirates two games in a row.

If the Bucs retaliated at all, they did so by throwing at the wrong guy.

Then the Reds responded with the weakest attempt at almost fighting in the history of baseball, followed by the most forced ejection of all time.

Finally, the fur ended up flying more on social media then it did on the field. And that happened between one guy who is retired and another guy who is on the 60-day injured list.

If only the Reds and Pirates weren’t both so lame, this would be one heck of a rivalry.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.