Tim Benz: Sick of ex-Pirates yet? Charlie Morton’s Cy Young-caliber year continues | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz: Sick of ex-Pirates yet? Charlie Morton’s Cy Young-caliber year continues

Tim Benz
Tampa Bay Rays’ Charlie Morton pitches to the Oakland Athletics during the first inning Monday, June 10, 2019, in St. Petersburg, Fla.

Tired of hearing about how those ex-Pirates are blossoming in Tampa after the Chris Archer trade? 

Austin Meadows and that annoying .346 batting average to lead the American League. Tyler Glasnow and that 1.80 ERA before his injury.

Tired of being reminded that Gerrit Cole is leading Major League Baseball with 130 strikeouts in Houston?

OK. I won’t do that anymore.

I’ll just start talking about Charlie Morton some more.

Morton improved to 8-0 with a 2.10 ERA last night. The former Pirates right-hander allowed no runs and just two hits in 6-2 Rays win over Oakland.

Morton described that as simply “feeling all right.” At times, he said he “lost a feel for his stuff.”

Really? This curve looked OK.

Morton says he’s “lucky to be here.”

Yes, in Tampa.

Granted, Morton got some defensive help from Tommy Pham and Kevin Kiermaier.

But, Kiermaier does that for everybody. It’s part of the reason the Rays — and their league-low $53 million payroll — lead the AL East.

Sigh. Heartwarming, right?

If that’s not enough for you, even former Pirate Jordan Luplow is doing pretty well in Cleveland. He has eight home runs for an Indians team that started Monday one slot out of the second American League wild-card spot.

Luplow’s OPS is .831. Entering play Monday night, that would’ve tied him for second place on the Pirates with Bryan Reynolds behind Josh Bell.

OK, I’m done.

For now.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.