Tim Benz: Sifting through Jim Rutherford’s mixed messages about Penguins | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz: Sifting through Jim Rutherford’s mixed messages about Penguins

Tim Benz
1306174_web1_GettyImages-801161692
Getty Images
Penguins general manager Jim Rutherford has been sending some mixed signals regarding the state of the roster.

Penguins general manager Jim Rutherford is sure sending a lot of smoke signals.

Either that or Rome is burning.

Maybe both.

For the first time since 2006, a Penguins season ended without the team securing at least one playoff victory. And after the season ended, Rutherford said changes needed to happen.

To his credit, Rutherford made one transaction already by trading defenseman Olli Maatta to Chicago for forward Dominik Kahun.

Despite being a Maatta fan over the years, I like the move.

Rutherford admitted he attempted another trade, trying to ship Phil Kessel to the Wild. But the Penguins winger nixed the deal via his limited movement clause.

But if the trade action simply stops at Maatta moving out for a bottom-six forward, that’s hardly hitting “control-alt-delete” on the current state of the team.

So what’s next after the Maatta maneuver? Rutherford clearly wants to keep us — and the league — guessing.

The general manager made the local media rounds Monday in the wake of the trade to get Kahun. And the team floated some comments from Rutherford on their own, perhaps coincidentally.

Perhaps not.

Let’s start with the Kessel question and whether trade talks involving him are truly dead.

“I’m not going to be aggressive on a trade and have the player control where he goes because it doesn’t work out for the team when you do that,” Rutherford told Mark Madden of 105.9 the X on Monday. “If somebody calls with an idea that makes sense for him or most of our other players, I’m going to look at. But I’m not going to be aggressive and bounce from team to team and let the player control where he goes.”

OK. That’s all well and good. But if a team approaches Rutherford with a package that he likes, and it’s not one of Kessel’s preferred destinations, Kessel is still in control. The player still says “yay” or “nay.”

Does it really matter who picks up the phone and orchestrates the idea?

Rutherford then elaborated on how good of a player Kessel is, how well it could still work if Kessel stays, how much he likes him, how good of a guy he is, and how they couldn’t have won two Stanley Cup titles without him.

All that after trying to pawn him off on Minnesota for Jason Zucker.

Yeah. I’m sure all of those flowery thoughts were dancing through Rutherford’s head when Kessel said “thanks, but no thanks” to the idea of heading out to St. Paul a few weeks ago.

Then there’s Rutherford’s willingness to keep speculation open about the prospect of trading Evgeni Malkin, Kris Letang and Patric Hornqvist.

Before noon on Monday, the general manager primed that pump on 93.7 The Fan.

“I didn’t say that I was going to actively push to trade the guys that you just mentioned, but I didn’t say that I wouldn’t,” Rutherford said. “(Wayne) Gretzky was traded, one of the greatest players of all time. Sometimes, there’s certain packages that come along that you have to look at. That’s why I kept that door open.”

By 12:20 p.m., though, Pens TV released a “behind the scenes” video of the team’s scouting staff getting ready for the draft.

The video opens with Rutherford addressing his staff.

“We are coming off a season where it ended, where were very disappointed. But we did have a 100-point season. Because of that we are going to retool our team a little bit. We aren’t going to start into a rebuild. I feel that there is still an opportunity here to win a Cup.”

Trading Maatta and Kessel and perhaps Hornqvist, that’s a retool. Doing that, plus a trade of Malkin or Letang is a rebuild.

So based on that, take Letang and Malkin off the list. That won’t happen unless a team approved by those players returns an ungodly haul.

The real debate is about the level of Rutherford’s sincerity when he claims he’s waiting for teams to come to him on Kessel.

My hunch is that Rutherford can sing this song all he wants, but he’s likely investigating every avenue possible to relieve the team of Kessel’s $6.8 million against the cap. Then he’ll investigate every avenue possible to get Kessel on board to agree.

If not, he better be as good at trying to convince himself that Kessel will be content here in 2019-20 as he is at trying to convince us.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.