Tim Benz: Steelers’ Mike Tomlin’s comments on Myles Garrett triggers rage from Browns fans | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz: Steelers’ Mike Tomlin’s comments on Myles Garrett triggers rage from Browns fans

Tim Benz
1966380_web1_AP_19319029490728
AP
Pittsburgh Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin watches warm-ups before an NFL football game against the Cleveland Browns, Thursday, Nov. 14, 2019, in Cleveland.

During his weekly press conference Tuesday, Pittsburgh Steelers coach Mike Tomlin made the following comments about Myles Garrett swinging his helmet at Mason Rudolph in last Thursday’s game.

He was asked if it was at all a “teachable moment” for his players.

“I don’t know that we did anything to make it happen in the first place,” Tomlin replied. “That’s why I said we didn’t have anything to learn from it.”

When Mary Kay Cabot of Cleveland.com tweeted out those comments to her followers, her timeline exploded.

The responses in the thread were unreal. The number of Cleveland fans who have convinced themselves that Rudolph is to blame and Garrett is somehow a victim is awe inspiring.

“Got what he deserved”? Rudolph tussled with Garrett on the ground after being thrown to the turf late, and he “deserved” nearly getting his skull cracked open?

Please! If the roles were reversed and Rudolph had done that to Garrett, Browns fans would’ve been demanding that Rudolph get charged with a hate crime on the spot.

That’s rich.

The team got fined the same amount as the other team, and it was their quarterback who was attacked!? Plus, the center who tried to protect his quarterback is suspended for three weeks.

That’s not holding them accountable?

Well, I have eyes. That’s how. Garrett took Rudolph down well after the ball was gone. That’s “what led to all of this.”

And even if you choose to ignore that fact and blame Rudolph for “starting it” by scuffling with Garrett on the ground, that in no way offsets Garrett’s response. Stop with the blame shifting, Cleveland.

Wow! Now we are taking the “whataboutism” to actions removed from the cause of the problem.

So I’m clear, Amanda, Tomlin’s decision to call a pass play legitimizes Garrett’s response at swinging a helmet at the quarterback?

Got it.

Seriously, that’s your takeaway here? It’s Tomlin’s responsibility to know in advance that if he calls a pass play, that may incite Garrett to go insane, and Tomlin should be held responsible for that?

Stay in your lane, Amanda. You Clevelanders can’t irrationally blame everything that goes wrong on a football field on Tomlin.

That’s a Pittsburgh thing! We own that. Back off!

Eh, based on her Twitter handle, she’s an Ohio State fan, too. So, obviously, she is incapable of balanced, rational thought anyway. I shouldn’t be surprised.

Actually, every Pittsburgh news outlet did. We just have the ability to differentiate a minor offense — or maybe even self-defense — from assault.

How ‘bout you?

So now Tomlin must be held accountable for what the Cleveland players do? I’m confused.

Anyway, keep reading. The comments from blinded Browns fans will have you laughing all day. They’ve completely victimized Garrett and are making Rudolph and Tomlin into the villains in this situation.

I’m not even mad about it. I’m more impressed than anything. The cognitive detachment from reality is magnificent.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.