Tim Benz: Wildcat worked, but let’s hope Steelers don’t have to use it again | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz: Wildcat worked, but let’s hope Steelers don’t have to use it again

Tim Benz
1751017_web1_gtr-Steelers04-100119
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pittsburgh Steelers’ James Conner reacts after a first down run against the Cincinnati Bengals in the second quarter Monday, Sept. 30, 2019 at Heinz Field.
1751017_web1_gtr-Steelers05-100219
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pittsburgh Steelers running back Jaylen Samuels runs the wildcat offense in the first half against the Cincinnati Bengals Monday, Sept. 30, 2019 at Heinz Field.

During his weekly press conference, Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin was gruff, dismissive, generally terse and a bit on edge.

Even more so than normal, I mean.

It was almost as if his team had fallen to 0-4 against the Cincinnati Bengals as opposed to trouncing them, 27-3, the night before to salvage their season.

You can’t blame Tomlin, though. He probably only got a few hours of sleep after the Monday night affair. He has one less day than normal to prepare for a huge game against the hated Baltimore Ravens.

And he had to admit to all of us in the press, what he, no doubt, was internalizing all week.

Man, we are so desperate we had to resort to a tricked-up offense to beat the stinkin’ Bungles! What have we become?!

Well, Tomlin didn’t quite say that. But he came close.

Tomlin assessed his team’s use of the wildcat offense — and similar unconventional, misdirection-based sets — as “somewhat gimmicky.”

The direct snaps to running back Jaylen Samuels and James Conner sure seemed to keep the Bengals off balance.

Plus, Tomlin admitted the coaching staff felt the need to dig deep into their bag of tricks to protect first-year starting quarterback Mason Rudolph. The franchise last used the wildcat extensively with Le’Veon Bell in a 2015 win at San Diego when Mike Vick was at quarterback.

“It limited Mason’s exposure to the defense,” Tomlin said.

“When you’ve got a young quarterback, sometimes you can assist them by turning a 70-play game into a 50-play game. And sometimes a bunch of exposure is not good exposure. So I thought it was helpful to him to chew up some of those snaps to limit his exposure to the defense while putting the ball in the hands of some capable men and produce some plays.”

In other words, they are still scared to death of having Roethlisberger’s replacement do too much.

Or, should I say, do much at all.

Not even against the lowly Cincinnati Bengals.

Resorting to trickery is one thing. Feeling obligated to do so against a woeful opponent who is also 0-3 is something more. That had to hurt Tomlin’s ego.

Truth be told, as limited as Rudolph may be at this stage of his development, the Steelers probably would’ve been superior enough to have won Monday night playing straight-up.

The Steelers defense was so good (eight sacks, two forced turnovers, 175 yards against and three points allowed) — and the whole Cincinnati squad was so bad — that Rudolph should’ve been able to win a conventional game by at least a score of 6-3.

Unfortunately, desperate times call for desperate measures. At 0-3, Tomlin wanted to make sure he put his club in the best position to win. Therefore, the decision was made to catch the Bengals off-guard, and it worked.

The Steelers ran the Matt Canada-esque offense of pitches, dump offs, shovel passes, wildcat snaps and jet sweeps to perfection. Samuels and Conner totaled 208 yards from scrimmage and two touchdowns.

As a result, Rudolph only needed to push the ball in excess of 10 yards downfield three times. According to ESPN.com, Rudolph’s 28 passes averaged 3.5 air yards. That’s the fewest for a Pittsburgh quarterback since ESPN began tracking the stat in 2006.

But how long can that approach last in the NFL? Based on what Tomlin said, perhaps just those four quarters against the Bengals.

“I acknowledge that it could be very different from what you saw Monday night,” Tomlin said of Sunday’s game against the Ravens.

As Tomlin pointed out, “the nature and the function” of what the Steelers did versus Cincy is present in the Ravens offense because of mobile quarterback Lamar Jackson. So trotting out that wildcat against the Ravens may not be wise, given that Baltimore’s coaches are intimately familiar with that look.

“You can’t run it every week,” Tomlin continued. “But it was effective Monday night. We’ll see if we utilize it, or utilize it in a different way this week.”

What I prefer they utilize is a traditional run game. Former head coach Bill Cowher tried to shield Roethlisberger when he was a first-year starting quarterback, too. He did so by having Big Ben hand the ball to Jerome Bettis and Duce Staley.

Based on how the line has blocked and how poorly the backs have carried the ball this season, Tomlin was more willing to resurrect the 2014 North Carolina State playbook.

I can’t criticize. The Steelers are 29th in the NFL in rushing. So it’s probably best to underhand shovel the ball to Conner and Samuels instead.

That’s a hidden story here, too. Forget for a moment what dredging up the wildcat said about Tomlin’s insecurity throwing the ball in a professional-offense fashion.

What does it say about his faith running the ball with a Pro Bowl back and a bunch of highly paid Pro Bowl linemen?

“We are just in a fragile state right now. And we just need to do, whatever it is we need to do, to move the ball and win football games,” Tomlin said.

So the wildcat was fun. It succeeded. And I’m glad they did it.

But if we never see it again, that may actually be a sign of progress.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.