Tim Benz: USWNT won the World Cup and lost a dumb argument | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World Sports

Tim Benz: USWNT won the World Cup and lost a dumb argument

Tim Benz
1384569_web1_AFP_1IG0GB
Getty Images
U.S. players including forward Megan Rapinoe celebrate with the trophy after the beating the Netherlands to win the World Cup title July 7, 2019.

The United States Women’s National Team won the World Cup.

And it lost one stupid argument.

The first thing is more important. The second thing is their own fault.

Prior to her team’s 2-0 victory over the Netherlands to win the World Cup, American star Megan Rapinoe complained that her team’s game had to occur on the same day as the American men were playing Mexico in the Gold Cup final.

It was also on the same day that Brazil was playing Peru in the Copa America final.

If you sift through a lot of what Rapinoe said there, her gripe was a lot less about what was wise to do from a broadcast standpoint and a lot more to do with her definition of “respect” and her attempt to draw a connection to the pay gap between the women’s game and the men’s game.

The notion that this women’s team was being scrutinized for being too brash was a strawman. And so is this argument.

The only reason I knew the other soccer games were on the same day as the Women’s World Cup is because Rapinoe vented in the first place. Hence — for an average non-soccer fan like me — why was having all three soccer games on the same day a bad thing, exactly?

After all, the point of Rapinoe’s rant (allegedly) was to “grow the game.” And I, for one, am more of a soccer fan today than I was yesterday.

I watched on TV. I listened on the radio. I followed the scores. I read all three game stories on the matches. I stayed plugged in.

And I’m someone who may not care about soccer at all for the next 364 days. But in this case, for one day, soccer is what I watched more than anything, and I bet that was the case in many cities in the U.S.

Perhaps by a happy accident of ill-planning—as Rapinoe points out—soccer was given its own day in America when nothing else was going on except a few get-away baseball games before the All-Star break.

Also, perhaps by a happy accident, the start times for the games lined up in succession so that fans could watch all three in a row if they wanted.

It was only because of Rapinoe’s complaints — ironically — that I knew the other games were falling on the same day. I’m not a soccer fan at all. And I thought it was great.

It was like soccer in America had a day akin to the Thursday that kicks off the NCAA basketball tournament, the first day of Major League Baseball playoff games or the divisional round of the NFL playoffs.

And the women’s sport was in the spotlight as the biggest event of the day. At least in the U.S.

So, what’s the problem, Megan?

The answer is: There wasn’t one.

This is a classic example of the women’s team saying it wants “equal treatment,” when in reality it wants “special treatment.”

Soccer had a great day in America on Sunday. It held court. It was the biggest sport in the country.

And Rapinoe was the biggest star on the stage.

I’m sorry if that wasn’t enough for her.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.