Tim Benz: Who looks good and bad in released Antonio Brown trade conversation | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz: Who looks good and bad in released Antonio Brown trade conversation

Tim Benz
939435_web1_AP_18339691153357
AP
Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver Antonio Brown is seen during a game against the Los Angeles Chargers, Sunday, Dec. 2, 2018, in Pittsburgh.

I have no idea why Antonio Brown would send out the audio that he allegedly did from his trade conversations with Drew Rosenhaus.

He sounds moronic in the process and makes some other parties look bad.

Oh, well. He apparently put it online anyway.

If you haven’t heard it yet, the audio was posted through the “Boomin’ Experience Podcast.” It’s more than seven minutes of raw back-and-forth between Brown and his agent about how trade proceedings were progressing between the Steelers and various teams.

I can’t imagine any of the teams involved, or Rosenhaus, are particularly thrilled about what likely were private conversations being made public.

But now the information is out there. At least until Brown and/or Rosenhaus claim that they aren’t the voices on the tapes, or that this tape was hacked and released against A.B.’s will.

It sure sounds like a legitimate conversation between Brown and Rosenhaus, though. So let’s figure out who comes out looking good — and bad — after this listen behind the curtain.


Who looks good?

Drew Rosenhaus: He personifies the high-powered mover and shaker, Jerry Maguire inspiration we’ve labeled him to be.

Hands in a lot of pies. Breaking it down as simply as possible so Brown can wrap his brain around what’s happening. Doing whatever his client wants him to do and assuring him things will work out well.

Yeah, he misread the Raiders’ level of interest at first saying, “I kind of get the sense that they’re fading a little bit.” Maybe that means he couldn’t have gotten more cash out of them for Brown in the end.

However, I’d say $30 million guaranteed is good enough.

The Steelers: For all the criticism the Steelers have taken this offseason for being cold, unyielding, impersonal and austere in their business practices, they sure seem willing to help Brown get out of town by executing a deal ASAP.

As Rosenhaus tells Brown: “The Steelers have been good communicators with me. We’ve talked a couple of times every day about the teams, and they know that it’s important to us.”

The Patriots: On the tape, Rosenhaus implies that New England was a leading candidate to acquire Brown, saying that he put Steelers general manager Kevin Colbert “in touch with Bill Belichick” on the morning of the taped phone call.

Knowing what we now know about Rob Gronkowski’s retirement, it looks like the Patriots were trying to gird their pass-catching corps against his loss by potentially replacing him with Brown.

They may have been hoping to turn Brown into the next Randy Moss — a troubled but wildly talented receiver with good years still to come who blossoms in Foxborough.

Not exactly a “Patriot Way” kind of guy. But he’s one that would be deadly with Tom Brady.

The Titans: Boy, for a team that hasn’t seen a double-digit win season since 2008, Brown certainly sounded intrigued at the prospect of playing in Nashville.

“The Titans have been calling around, they probably be willing to make a splash, huh?” Brown asked Rosenhaus.

And Brown seemed to buy in when Rosenhaus pumped up the notion of him being the missing link to make Marcus Mariota the NFL’s next great quarterback.

Robert Kraft: Rosenhaus gushed about the finances Kraft could bestow upon Brown. And Brown even referred to the Patriots owner as a “cool guy.”

Maybe A.B. has been so self-absorbed with his own social media activity that he has been unaware of that whole Jupiter, Fla., thing.

But, hey, despite that, Kraft must have some swag with players outside of his own locker room.


Who looks bad?

The Bills and Redskins: Within the conversation, Rosenhaus brushes aside the Redskins as a potential partner because he doesn’t think their situation is conducive enough to winning.

Also, Brown confirms all the rumors that previously existed regarding his desire to shut down a potential trade to the Bills because he wasn’t interested in playing in upstate New York.

At one point, he bluntly says to Rosenhaus, “Don’t even waste time.”

The Steelers: With so many teams in the mix, Colbert still couldn’t do better than third- and fifth-round draft choices in return?

Really?

And, to reiterate, they were willing to trade him to New England?! Are you kidding?

At least that’s what Rosenhaus says.

When he “connected” Belichick and Colbert, the conversation could’ve been 30 seconds long with Colbert demanding more compensation because … it’s the Patriots. Belichick then saying “no,” and the phones getting hung up.

But Brown and Rosenhaus sure appeared to have the Steelers over a barrel, as they had been portrayed.

The Patriots: Hey, if they were close and interested in the player, why not get the deal done?

Now, the whole world knows New England was sniffing around but couldn’t do better in terms of a contract offer, or they were unwilling to approximate Oakland’s piddly return of two mid-round draft choices.

Then again, what the Steelers demanded may have been so outlandish that Belichick couldn’t possibly do a deal.

Brown: Where to start?

• Aside from Brown’s refusal to go to the Bills — which Rosenhaus appears to echo — the player sounds like he is being led around by the nose by his agent, with no clue as to how the process works.

• Multiple times in the discussion, Brown — for whatever reason — seems hung up on the “honor” and the “respect” that it means to have first- or second-round picks go back to the Steelers in exchange for him.

“Am I going top two rounds?” he asks Rosenhaus. “I’m going at least the first two rounds.”

Why should he care? He’s getting out of the place where he doesn’t want to be and getting more money to leave. So why does his ego need to be massaged in the process via the draft return back to Pittsburgh?

If that mattered to Brown, he shouldn’t have worked so hard to put the Steelers in position of zero leverage between January and March.

And since the return was so minimal, is Brown depressed now as a result?

• Forget Ben Roethlisberger’s radio interview and Mike Tomlin’s treatment of players and Art Rooney never inviting Brown to his house. This tape proves, more than ever, that Brown forced his way out of Pittsburgh for — as Rosenhaus says — as “lucrative” of a deal as possible.

This was 100 percent about money, period. Not how he was treated in Pittsburgh.

Later, Brown even has the gall to gripe about the Steelers’ vast revenue.

“They don’t care. They’re making money,” Brown said. “This (expletive) going on. This (expletive) ain’t ever ending.”

No. With Antonio Brown involved, this (expletive) truly “ain’t ever ending.”

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.