Tim Benz: Who wins battle of Steelers’ bad run defense vs. Bengals bad run game? | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz: Who wins battle of Steelers’ bad run defense vs. Bengals bad run game?

Tim Benz
1731318_web1_1710729-942bec4a4e0042099821c767d972c892
AP
Cincinnati Bengals running back Joe Mixon (28) rushes during the second half against the Buffalo Bills Sunday, Sept. 22, 2019, in Orchard Park, N.Y.

It’s the matchup we’ve all been waiting to see.

The easily resistible force vs. the highly movable object.

Also known as the anemic Cincinnati Bengals running game vs. the leaky Steelers rush defense.

It’ll be the game within the game between two teams with a combined 0-6 record.

I know. I can’t wait either.

The Steelers rush defense is 27th in the NFL, allowing a gaudy 139.3 yards per game. Meanwhile the Bengals are last in the league in rushing offense with a 41.7 yards per game average and a putrid 2.4 yards per carry.

Something’s gotta give!

And if the Steelers lose, it could be Pittsburgh’s patience.

A frequent theme in the Steelers-Bengals rivalry has been the Steelers’ superiority in the ground game. There have been 13 matchups since running backs Le’Veon Bell and Giovani Bernard were drafted by their respective teams in the second round in 2013.

Over that span, the Steelers have averaged 106.2 rushing yards per game against the Bengals, whereas Cincinnati averages 86.8 yards per contest against Pittsburgh.

Heightening that difference, in many of those games, the Bengals often have success in spurts in the running game but don’t stick with it effectively.

Look at Joe Mixon as an example. He has averaged 6.61 yards per attempt against the Steelers, but only 62.8 yards per game in his four contests against them.

As for Bernard, he has suited up against the Steelers 10 times. He averages 4.2 yards per carry, but only 25.7 yards per game against the Black and Gold.

Mixon is an interesting case in this game. He was hardly used in the first two weeks of the season, totaling a meager 27 yards on 17 rushes. But against Buffalo last week, new coach Zac Taylor seemed to discover his running back, getting him 17 touches for 94 total yards from scrimmage.

Given how the Steelers have been gashed by running backs from Seattle and San Francisco, one would have to assume that Taylor would be enticed to give the Steelers front a heavy dose of Mixon on Monday night.

“Too many times the pile has been falling forward,” Steelers coach Mike Tomlin said of the Steelers rush defense this year. “It’s better technique. It’s more physicality in terms of taking on blocks to minimize vertical holes so there isn’t more space when plays come to an end. Too many times (in the San Francisco game) the running backs were able to fall forward.”

Tomlin noted that issue is less about the quality of those who are making the tackle and more about how his defenders are combating blockers and minimizing space.

The Bengals’ offensive line is dealing with a lot of injuries. Jonah Williams is missing his entire rookie season with a torn labrum. Tackle Cordy Glenn has been in concussion protocol since the preseason. Tackle Andre Smith and guard Michael Jordan have been hit with injuries this year, too.

However, the Steelers have failed to properly exploit some backup players and some shaky offensive fronts in each of the first three games.

“Gap integrity is important,” defensive captain Cameron Heyward said. “We’ve got to set the edge. We’ve got to get off blocks. You’ve got to be in your gap. Too many times we play hero ball and try to do too much.”

Other criticisms Heyward had of the overall run-stuffing technique?

Not using their hands well enough has been a factor. Heyward noted that the team has had a tendency to swim blocks too much and, as a result, winds up getting washed out too often. The front also needs to be more honest while playing the run instead of concentrating exclusively on getting upfield to the passer.

It’s not all about the defensive linemen and outside linebackers, either. The inside linebackers haven’t done a great job shedding tackles or filling gaps either.

But as Heyward said this week, he’d break the finger of anyone who was pointing it at someone else given how badly the collective team has been.

It’s not a matter of “who” or “how.” It’s just a question of “can.”

Can the Steelers finally stop the run against a team that is usually unable to get the task accomplished in that regard?

“Stop the damn run,” T.J. Watt grumbled when asked about improvements needed for the defense this week. “That’s number one. Stop the run.”

That’s easier said than done, T.J. If the Steelers have proven anything this year, it’s that.

Now it’s time to prove they can be the defense the franchise envisioned when this squad was constructed in the offseason.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.