Tomlin: Depth chart remains ‘very fluid’ for QB Mason Rudolph, other Steelers players |

Tomlin: Depth chart remains ‘very fluid’ for QB Mason Rudolph, other Steelers players

Joe Rutter
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers quarterback Mason Rudolph plays against the Buccaneers Aug. 17, 2019 at Heinz Field.

The depth chart Pittsburgh Steelers coach Mike Tomlin unveiled Tuesday is similar to the one he provided at the beginning of the preseason.

Veterans Donte Moncrief, Mark Barron and Steve Nelson are starters at their respective positions. First-round pick Devin Bush is listed as a backup to Barron at inside linebacker. Second-year receiver James Washington is the backup to Moncrief. Matt Feiler remains the first-team right tackle.

One change to the preseason depth chart exists at quarterback, where Mason Rudolph leapfrogged Joshua Dobbs and will be Ben Roethlisberger’s backup.

“He took very good care of the ball,” Tomlin said about Rudolph, who had four touchdown passes and one interception in four preseason games. “He showed the natural maturation process you expect from second-year players. … He showed a guy that has been a lap around the track in that regards. He set the stage for a more consistent performance. I think he’s grown a lot in terms of his understanding of how we attack people and his role within the offense. It showed in his play.”

Tomlin said the pecking order at backup quarterback and other positions remains “very fluid.”

“There is no opportunity to breathe a sigh of relief,” Tomlin said. “It won’t be for Mason, it won’t be for any of us. He better earn that second quarterback job daily. If not, Dobbs will be waiting.”

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.