Troy Polamalu heads list of 122 nominees for Pro Football Hall of Fame | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Troy Polamalu heads list of 122 nominees for Pro Football Hall of Fame

Joe Rutter
1665521_web1_gtr-polamalu2-042719
AP
Troy Polamalu, the Pittsburgh Steelers’ first pick in the 2003 NFL draft, talks to the media at a news conference in Pittsburgh, Thursday, May 1, 2003. Polamali is a safety from Southern Cal.

Safety Troy Polamalu, who graced the Pittsburgh Steelers secondary for 12 seasons with his fierce play on the field and soft-spoken nature off it, is among the eight first-time nominees for the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

The Hall of Fame unveiled its list of 122 modern-day nominees Thursday, and Polamalu heads a list of Steelers nominees that included 2019 finalist Alan Faneca and semifinalist Hines Ward.

Other former Steelers players with nominations are nose tackle Casey Hampton, linebacker James Farrior and kicker Gary Anderson.

Polamalu was a four-time first-team All-Pro, eight-time Pro Bowl selection and 2010 NFL defensive player of the year. He is in his first year of eligibility.


Faneca has been named a finalist in each of the past four seasons. Ward has reached the semifinals the past three years.

The list of nominees will be pared to 25 semifinalists in November and 15 finalists in early January 2020.

As part of the NFL’s centennial celebration, the Hall of Fame will welcome 20 members for the Class of 2020. The group will include five modern-era players from the 122 nominated Wednesday and 10 senior candidates, three contributors and two coaches.

Senior candidates are players who have been retired for more than 25 years.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.