TSN’s Bob McKenzie: Penguins could still trade Phil Kessel to Minnesota | TribLIVE.com

TSN’s Bob McKenzie: Penguins could still trade Phil Kessel to Minnesota

Jonathan Bombulie
Staff | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ Phil Kessel scoops the puck into the offensive zone in the first period against the Islanders Tuesday, Oct. 30, 2018 at PPG Paints Arena.

A trade that would send Pittsburgh Penguins winger Phil Kessel to the Minnesota Wild remains a possibility, TSN’s Bob McKenzie said on his podcast Friday.

The Penguins reportedly had a deal done to send the popular 31-year-old to the Wild for speedy winger Jason Zucker, but Kessel used his no-trade clause to veto the deal. Kessel has a list of eight teams he can be traded to without prior consent, and Minnesota isn’t one of them.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if, at some point, it gets done with Minnesota,” McKenzie said. “Kessel’s ‘no’ to Pittsburgh wasn’t really a hard, 100 percent no so much as it was, ‘Naw, I don’t really want to go there. Maybe you could check with some other teams.’ I think there is frustration on Kessel’s part that the Penguins maybe aren’t checking with other teams or aren’t interested in doing deals with other teams where Kessel wants to go.”

McKenzie said Kessel would prefer to play for Arizona or Vegas, but the Coyotes haven’t made an offer the Penguins like and the Golden Knights are no longer interested in Kessel after acquiring Mark Stone from Ottawa at the trade deadline.

Kessel has averaged a point per game over the past two seasons, but the Penguins are looking to make changes to their roster and style of play after bowing out of the playoffs in a first-round sweep by the New York Islanders.

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all offseason long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review assistant sports editor. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.