Turning around Steelers’ 0-3 start begins with stopping the run | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Turning around Steelers’ 0-3 start begins with stopping the run

Chris Adamski
1716985_web1_1716985-9cd47c54f3ec454bbf2cb6850fd6f539
AP
Running back Raheem Mostert helped the 49ers average 4.2 yards per carry against the Steelers on Sunday.

The point of emphasis this week is so engrained into the psyche of the Pittsburgh Steelers defensive players T.J. Watt would not allow a reporter to finish asking the question.

“How does the Steelers defense get to being what it wants and needs to …”

“Stop the damn run!” Watt interrupted. “That’s No. 1 — stop the run.”

It became clear during an open locker room session Tuesday — two days after the Steelers lost their third consecutive game to open the season — the defense believes stopping the run is best way it can play a part in snapping the Steelers out of their funk.

“Gotta stop the run,” safety Terrell Edmunds said. “That’s a big emphasis right now.”

For prior versions of the Steelers defense, stopping the run was not only emphasized but was their identity. For the better part of a decade, opposing offenses would not bother putting much of a rushing attack into their gameplan. If they did, it was often abandoned after a few futile attempts.

The Steelers finished among the top three in the NFL in rushing defense 11 times from 2001-12.

They are 28th in the league at 139.3 yards per game this season after the San Francisco 49ers gashed them for 168 yards in a 24-20 victory Sunday.

“We’ve got to set the edge. We’ve got to get off blocks,” defensive captain Cameron Heyward said, “but you’ve got to be in your gap. And too many times, we’ve tried to play ‘hero ball’ and tried to do too much. When this defense is doing all right, we get stops. When we don’t, we’re an average football team.”

The Steelers, by their record, are worse than average. And they’re a worse-than-average defense against the rush, too.

But in the modern NFL proliferated by passing offenses and protected quarterbacks, does that matter as much?

The Steelers insist a stout run defense still means something.

“You’ve got to make teams one-dimensional,” Heyward said. “And if (opponents) have to pass every down because they can’t run the ball, we’re at an advantage.”

Stopping the run, Edmunds said, “opens up quarterbacks to trying to throw crazy passes, you could say. And that’s when tips and overthrows come about. And that’s when big plays (for the defense) happen.”

The Steelers aren’t necessarily being victimized by the big rushing play. It’s been more of a slow bleed. Opponents have managed just two carries of more than 19 yards against the Steelers (both by the Seattle Seahawks in Week 2). Pro Football Focus likewise paints a rosier picture. It rates the Steelers’ No. 7 in run defense.

But the Steelers problems, in part, have been more of volume. Though they rank tied for 13th in yards allowed per carry (4.1), only two teams have allowed more rushing attempts (102).

Opponents are rushing 48.11% of plays, the fourth-highest rate in the NFL. That’s partially a function of being behind so often through three games.

The Steelers believe that stiffening against the run will result in them leading games more often.

“We still believe we have a lot of good guys on our defense,” defensive end Stephon Tuitt said. “So for us, it’s a lot of not just stop the run but be dominant.”

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.