U.S. Open Preview: Koepka looks for threepeat, Mickleson wants his first | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

U.S. Open Preview: Koepka looks for threepeat, Mickleson wants his first

Tim Benz
Phil Mickelson watches his tee shot on the 10th hole during a practice round for the U.S. Open Championship golf tournament, Tuesday, June 11, 2019, in Pebble Beach, Calif.
Phil Mickelson hits from the 18th fairway of the Pebble Beach Golf Links during the final round of the AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am golf tournament in Pebble Beach, Calif. At Pebble Beach, a course teeming with history for Mickelson, the 48-year-old, five-time major champion will come face to face with what might be his last, best chance to win the U.S. Open and become the sixth player to complete the career Grand Slam.

Golf’s U.S. Open starts today. So that’s the topic of our Thursday “Breakfast With Benz” podcast.

We turn to our expert on the links, Brian Taylor of “Real Golf Radio.” http://www.realgolfradio.com. He joins us to talk about all the major championships.

Those events are often won by Brooks Koepka. He has four under his belt already, including the past two U.S. Opens. Can he make it three in a row?

If it’s not going to be Koepka, then the gambling money seems to be going toward Tiger Woods, Rory McIlroy, and Dustin Johnson.

Taylor tells us who is the best bet out of that bunch.

Also, Pebble Beach may play a little bit differently than what fans of the course are used to seeing. Taylor gives us a look at the specifics.

And we talk about Phil Mickelson quite a bit. Is this his last, best chance to finally win a U.S. Open?

LISTEN: Tim Benz and Brian Taylor talk U.S. Open golf and Brooks Koepka’s chances at a threepeat

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.