Vegas sours on Penguins after last season’s struggles |

Vegas sours on Penguins after last season’s struggles

Jonathan Bombulie
The Penguins lost to the New York Islanders in Game Four of the first round of the Stanley Cup Playoffs on Tuesday, April 16, 2019, at PPG Paints Arena.

After a 100-point season followed by a first-round playoff exit, Las Vegas doesn’t like the Pittsburgh Penguins quite as much as they used to.

The Penguins are a 10-1 choice to win the Eastern Conference in odds released by on Monday. They were a 6-1 pick to win the conference before the start of last season.

The fall down the tote board hasn’t been precipitous for the Penguins, who made a handful of offseason alterations to their roster including the trade of Phil Kessel. They remain tied with the Washington Capitals as the fifth choice in the conference.

Tampa Bay is the favorite at 4-1, followed by Boston and Toronto at 7-1. Fresh off the signing of goalie Sergei Bobrovsky, Florida is up to fourth at 9-1. The much-improved New York-area trio of the Rangers, Islanders and Devils has moved up to 12-1, just behind the Penguins and Capitals.

Columbus took the biggest hit, falling from 12-1 at the start of last season to 25-1 now.

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all offseason long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review assistant sports editor. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.