Vikings release former Pitt lineman Adam Bisnowaty |

Vikings release former Pitt lineman Adam Bisnowaty

Jerry DiPaola
Pitt’s Adam Bisnowaty celebrates after Pitt beat Penn State 42-39 Saturday Sept. 10, 2016 at Heinz Field. (Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review)

At 6-foot-6, 305 pounds and with youth on his side, chances are good that Adam Bisnowaty will find himself in some NFL training camp this summer.

But the former Pitt offensive tackle was released Wednesday by the Minnesota Vikings, his fourth NFL team. The Vikings were overstocked on the line with 15 players, including his Pitt teammate Brian O’Neill, a 2018 second-round draft choice. O’Neill made 11 starts last season.

Bisnowaty, a Fox Chapel graduate, was a sixth-round draft choice of the New York Giants in 2017 and started the final game of his rookie season. He was released by the Giants in May, 2018, and spent time with the Carolina Panthers and Detroit Lions before joining the Vikings’ practice squad in October. He signed a futures contract after the season, but found himself a victim of the numbers game.

Bisnowaty, 25, was highly decorated at Pitt, earning a spot on the All-ACC Academic team four times and the All-ACC first team twice (coaches vote) and the second team twice (media vote) in 2015 and 2016. Plus, he was in Death Valley the day the Panthers upset eventual national champion Clemson.

At Pitt, one of his best and most trusted friends was Oakland Raiders quarterback Nathan Peterman. This video proves it:

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | NFL | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.