Pitt picked to finish 4th in ACC Coastal; opening-night opponent Virginia ranks 1st | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

Pitt picked to finish 4th in ACC Coastal; opening-night opponent Virginia ranks 1st

Jerry DiPaola
1443404_web1_gtr-pitt12-111118
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt’s Darrin Hall breaks past Virginia Tech’s Tyree Rodgers in the first half Saturday, Nov. 10, 2018 at Heinz Field.

If a poll of 173 media members is to be believed, Pitt’s opener against Virginia on Aug. 31 at Heinz Field will be one of its most difficult games of the season.

Virginia received 82 votes to win the ACC Coastal in a poll conducted last week at the ACC Media Days in Charlotte, N.C. Pitt was the choice of eight voters, finishing fourth behind Virginia, Miami (55) and Virginia Tech (20).

Evey team in the Coastal received a first-place vote, including fifth-place Duke (six), followed by North Carolina and Georgia Tech, respectively, with one each.

Defending national and conference champion Clemson was the overwhelming choice to win the ACC and its Atlantic Division, receiving 170 votes to win the conference title and 171 to win the division. Syracuse received two first-place votes in both while Virginia was the pick of one voter to win the conference.

In Atlantic Division voting, Syracuse was second, followed by Florida State, N.C. State, Boston College, Wake Forest and Louisville.

Pitt will play each Coastal opponent, plus Syracuse and Boston College.

The Atlantic and Coastal winners will meet for the conference championship Dec. 7 at Charlotte’s Bank of America Stadium.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.