‘Hungry’ Steelers defense makes splash with 8 sacks in win over Bengals | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

‘Hungry’ Steelers defense makes splash with 8 sacks in win over Bengals

Chris Adamski
1746527_web1_gtr-Steelers22-100119
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Steelers’ Stephon Tuitt puts pressure on Bengals quarterback Andy Dalton in the fourth quarter Monday, Sept. 30, 2019 at Heinz Field.

It was a party at Heinz Field on Monday Night.

A sack party.

“You put eight sacks up,” defensive end Stephon Tuitt said, “that’s when you see guys having a great time. Everybody is jumping around and smiling. It was really good to have that, good to see that.”

There was much that was good to see from the Pittsburgh Steelers in their first win of the season. But defensively, perhaps nothing was better than the eight sacks it got of Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Andy Dalton during the 27-3 victory.

The eight sacks more than doubled the team’s total for the season. After leading the NFL in sacks each of the previous two seasons, the Steelers had six sacks through three games before Monday’s explosion.

“We were just so hungry as a defense … to make that splash,” said outside linebacker T.J. Watt, who had 1½ sacks to give him four for the season. “And we just never take our foot off that gas pedal and you saw that tonight.”

Cameron Heyward had his first 2½ sacks of the season, rookie Devin Bush had his first career sack and Javon Hargrave and Tyson Alualu each had a sack during the blowout.

Pretty much the only member of the starting front seven who did not have a sack was Tuitt, who came into the game with a team-high 3½. Tuitt, though, was credited with two of the Steelers’ 12 official “QB hits” of Dalton.

Tomlin said having a lead and being able to tee off on Dalton helped pad the Steelers’ sack total Monday.

“It’s (the pass rush) been there all season, but it showed up tonight, because of the situations, because we were controlling the football game,” Tomlin said. “So, it was able to be highlighted, and I think it’s just a lesson for all of us. In an effort for us to be at our best, it takes collaborative work in all three phases to produce an environment where your strengths get an opportunity to show, and it was able to be shown tonight.”

The Steelers are tied for fourth in the NFL in sacks with 14.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.