West Virginia defeats Ben DiNucci-led James Madison in opener | TribLIVE.com
WVU

West Virginia defeats Ben DiNucci-led James Madison in opener

Associated Press
1616083_web1_1616083-cd67a8de87d94f738fa2d2769b54d9b9
AP
West Virginia coach Neal Brown and quarterback Austin Kendall chat between plays during the first half against James Madison on Saturday, Aug. 31, 2019, in Morgantown, W.Va.
1616083_web1_1616083-67e03b226d764177af223847581c6ac5
AP
James Madison quarterback Ben DiNucci, a Pine-Richland grad and former Pitt QB, attempts a pass against West Virginia.

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — Austin Kendall threw two second-half touchdown passes in his debut at West Virginia, and the Mountaineers overcame some struggles to hold off James Madison, 20-13, on Saturday.

Kendall couldn’t generate a ton of offense under constant pressure, but the Oklahoma graduate transfer did just enough to give new coach Neal Brown a victory in his debut while preventing the Mountaineers from losing to an FCS opponent for the first time.

West Virginia’s strengths entering the season were its depth at running back and on the offensive and defensive lines. All of those units underperformed as James Madison dominated the line of scrimmage throughout.

The Mountaineers averaged 1.4 yards per rush, leaving it up to Kendall to bail them out.

He did — barely.

“Say what you want,” Brown said. “The offense wasn’t pretty.”

Kendall found Tevin Bush on a short pass that turned into a 41-yard gain to start the third quarter, leading to Kendall’s 28-yard TD toss to Florida State transfer George Campbell.

Evan Staley kicked two field goals for West Virginia, including a 43-yarder early in the fourth that put West Virginia ahead 13-10.

Keith Washington intercepted Ben DiNucci’s next pass, and West Virginia took over at the Dukes 30. On third down, Kendall found Bush wide open behind two defenders in the end zone on a 22-yard scoring pass. Kendall finished 27 of 42 for 260 yards.

The Mountaineers entered the season with a young squad, and their concerns only seemed to grow after getting outgained 328-294.

James Madison’s DiNucci, a Pine-Richland product and former Pitt player, impressed with both his running and passing. He twice converted long third-down throws on the next drive, leading to Ethan Ratke’s 31-yard field goal with 4 minutes, 33 seconds remaining.

James Madison had two chances with the ball after that but couldn’t get into scoring position.

“We weren’t consistent enough with our passing game,” Dukes coach Curt Cignetti said. “I thought they wore us down a little bit as the game went on.”

The Dukes looked like the better team for much of the game under their new coach and showed why they are ranked No. 2 in the FCS preseason coaches’ poll.

“I think we have a chance to be a good football team,” Cignetti said.

West Virginia plays at Missouri next Saturday.

Categories: Sports | WVU
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.