West Virginia QB Austin Kendall hurt early in loss to Iowa State | TribLIVE.com
WVU

West Virginia QB Austin Kendall hurt early in loss to Iowa State

Associated Press
1799025_web1_1799025-38312783f7554ae88cef94d50ce4627c
AP
Iowa State running back Breece Hall dives for a touchdown past West Virginia safety Sean Mahone during the second half Saturday, Oct. 12, 2019, in Morgantown, W.Va.
1799025_web1_1799025-61af63322eae47a49f92b14b9dbdba7c
AP
West Virginia quarterback Jack Allison attempts a pass during the second half against Iowa State on Saturday, Oct. 12, 2019, in Morgantown, W.Va.
1799025_web1_1799025-0d8eb91982a94047b13dbfd57ac9d59a
AP
West Virginia wide receiver T.J. Simmons scores a touchdown after getting past Iowa State defensive back Justin Bickham during the first half Saturday, Oct. 12, 2019, in Morgantown, W.Va.

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — Breece Hall might have given Iowa State the dependable option at running back the Cyclones have been looking for since star David Montgomery left.

The freshman rushed for 132 yards and scored three touchdowns to lead Iowa State to a 38-14 victory over West Virginia on Saturday night in a game in which the Mountaineers lost quarterback Austin Kendall to injury.

Hall scored on a pair of 1-yard runs in the second and fourth quarters and also had a 12-yard TD in the third quarter for the Cyclones (4-2, 2-1 Big 12).

“He certainly did a great job tonight and hopefully he can build on that,” Iowa State coach Matt Campbell said. “I expect that he would.”

Kendall was hit hard while attempting a pass during West Virginia’s first series. He did not return and was replaced by backup Jack Allison.

West Virginia coach Neal Brown said Kendall appeared to sustain a chest injury and will know more by early in the week.

“It’s not an arm or shoulder injury,” said Brown, whose team is 3-3, 1-2.

Brock Purdy threw for one TD and ran for another for Iowa State, who held the Mountaineers scoreless in the second half. The Cyclones scored 17 points in the fourth quarter to pull away.

“I’m not disappointed in our effort. I thought our guys were ready to play,” Brown said. “We just ran out of gas. They are one of the top offenses in the country, and I thought we did a pretty good job holding them in check, 372 yards.”

The 205-pound Hall is the third running back to lead the Cyclones in rushing this season and the first to eclipse 100 yards. Purdy had 102 yards a week ago against TCU.

Johnnie Lang started Saturday’s game and had four carries for 11 yards before giving way to Hall, who entered the game fifth on the team with 84 rushing yards on 18 carries.

“Breece just brings a lot to the table,” Iowa State wide receiver La’Michael Pettway said. “He’s physical. He can move. I like his feet. He’s got a quick twitch, and he’s smart. With Breece just being a freshman, he still has a lot to learn so that can be scary.”

The Mountaineers were limited to 190 yards of offense. Allison had one good series but couldn’t generate enough offense to keep up with Purdy. Allison finished 18 of 24 for 140 yards with one touchdown pass and an interception.

“I think it’s tough when a backup quarterback has to come into a game and play,” Brown said. “In college football, you don’t get as many reps. I thought under the circumstances he did an OK job.”

The Mountaineers will be without cornerback Hakeem Bailey for most of next weekend’s game after the senior was called for targeting for a hit on wide receiver Tarique Milton early in the third quarter.

Categories: Sports | WVU
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.