West Virginia to face hungry Missouri team in 2nd game of season | TribLIVE.com
WVU

West Virginia to face hungry Missouri team in 2nd game of season

Associated Press
1637992_web1_cd67a8de87d94f738fa2d2769b54d9b9-cd67a8de87d94f738fa2d2769b54d9b9-0
AP
West Virginia coach Neal Brown and quarterback Austin Kendall chat between plays during the first half against James Madison on Saturday, Aug. 31, 2019, in Morgantown, W.Va.

COLUMBIA, Mo. — Missouri coach Barry Odom insisted all fall his team is good enough to play with just about anybody into the fourth quarter.

That prediction turned out lousy for the Tigers last weekend.

Despite a frantic rally, Missouri fell 37-31 at Wyoming in one of the big upsets so far this season. The Tigers allowed 297 yards and three touchdowns on the ground, and not even a 423-yard passing performance by transfer quarterback Kelly Bryant could save them.

“Obviously not the start that we were anticipating there,” Odom said. “We understand who we are and any game that if we prepare the right way and then we go execute, any game that we’ve got on our schedule will be decided in the fourth quarter. That’s who we are as a team.”

College Videos

That’s not so bad against the likes of Alabama. Not so good against Wyoming.

Now, the Tigers get a chance to right a start that went wrong when West Virginia visits Saturday. The Mountaineers are in a rebuild after coach Dana Holgorsen left for Houston, and they needed 10 points in the fourth quarter to squeak out a 20-13 win over James Madison in their opener.

And if the Tigers had trouble stopping the run, the Mountaineers had trouble getting it started.

Known for its prolific offenses under Holgorsen, West Virginia managed 34 yards rushing on 24 attempts in Neal Brown’s first game as coach. The Mountaineers’ longest carry? Five yards.

“The run game was really poor,” said Brown, who had been banking on the run game being one of the most experienced units on the team. “You can look at the stat sheet and say that. I think we lacked physicality across the board. It’s easy to blame the O-line or the running backs in the run game, but everybody has a piece in it. It just wasn’t very good.”

The two schools, who will always be tied together for their roles during conference realignment — the Tigers bolted to the SEC, the Mountaineers backfilled from the old Big East — are meeting for just the third time in Columbia. The most recent of those was 1994.

In his first start since transferring from Clemson, Bryant was at turns dynamic and dismal. He had some gaudy passing numbers, including a couple of touchdown throws, but often fled the pocket too early and threw an interception.

“Kelly hadn’t played in a year, basically,” Odom said, “but out of the gate, he played pretty well. We always would like a couple back.”

West Virginia quarterback Austin Kendall wants to see overall improvement after a sluggish start. The Mountaineers were outgained 328-294 by James Madison.

“I missed too many vertical balls that were out of the reach of our receivers’ hands,” said Kendall, an Oklahoma graduate transfer who threw for 260 yards and two TDs. “We’ve got to be better. We didn’t run the ball well. Sometimes we didn’t throw the ball well. We’ve got to be better overall.”

Categories: Sports | WVU
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.