Westmoreland Campus Clippings: UPG women’s soccer moves up | TribLIVE.com
District College

Westmoreland Campus Clippings: UPG women’s soccer moves up

Bill Beckner
1685527_web1_ptr-SoccerSTOCK2

Pitt-Greensburg looks like it plans to stay in the regional women’s soccer rankings.

The Bobcats (5-0) moved up a spot, to No. 8, in the United Soccer Coaches Division III Great Lakes Region rankings. UPG has posted four shutouts and has outscored its opponents 16-2.

In addition, a pair of UPG players were lauded by the conference for their strong play of late.

Freshman forward Ashley Lucas and sophomore goalkeeper Lauren Yoder shared AMCC player of the week honors.


Both players helped UPG defeat Chatham, 4-2. Chatham was ranked No. 7 in the region at the time.

Lucas leads the conference in points (15) and is second in goals (5).

Yoder is 5-0 in net with a 0.40 goals-against average and a 91.9 save percentage.

Men’s golf

Randolph Macon: Freshman Zach Boote (Greensburg Central Catholic) opened his college career with an even-par 72 at the Tom Kinder Memorial in Harrisonburg, Va. He sat in sixth place heading into Tuesday’s second round. He made six birdies and made the turn at 3-under.

Men’s soccer

Seton Hill: The Griffins (3-1) moved up one spot to No. 23 in the latest United Soccer Coaches Top 25. They remained No 3 in the Atlantic Regional rankings.

Women’s soccer

Seton Hill: Redshirt senior forward Italia Biondi (Penn-Trafford) was named PSAC West athlete of the week after a two-goal, one-assist game against Gannon. The Griffins won, 4-2.

Women’s cross country

Seton Hill: After winning the Doug Watts Invitational in Edinboro, the Griffins moved up to No. 3 in the USTFCCCA Atlantic Regional rankings.

Bill Beckner Jr. is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bill by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | College-District
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.