White House misspells Red Sox as ‘Red Socks’ for team’s Trump visit | TribLIVE.com

White House misspells Red Sox as ‘Red Socks’ for team’s Trump visit

Steven Adams
The Boston Red Sox celebrate after Game 5 of baseball’s World Series against the Los Angeles Dodgers on Oct. 28, 2018, in Los Angeles. The Red Sox won the game 5-1 to win the series 4 games to 1.

A misspelling Thursday is irking some baseball fans.

The Boston Red Sox were due for a visit with President Donald Trump at 3:45 in the afternoon but the White House misspelled the team’s name as “Red Socks” on the schedule.

“President Trump Welcomes the 2018 World Series Champions The Boston Red Socks to the White House,” read the schedule of events to be streamed live Thursday.

A link from that schedule web page pointed to a White House YouTube page where the spelling error was repeated.

The mistake has been corrected.

In case you’re wondering why the team spells their name as they do.

The 2018 World Series championship team received the traditional presidential invitation but some team members have declined.

The Boston Globe reported that Red Sox manager Alex Cora said the trip wouldn’t feel right given what he considers the Trump administration’s poor treatment of his native Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria.

Other players skipping the honor are Mookie Betts, Xander Bogaerts, David Price, Jackie Bradley Jr., Rafael Devers, Christian Vazquez and Hector Velazquez, according to The Boston Globe.

Steven Adams is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Steven at 412-380-5645 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.