Whitehall’s Quallich finishes 8th at Drive, Chip & Putt | TribLIVE.com
Other Local

Whitehall’s Quallich finishes 8th at Drive, Chip & Putt

Bill Beckner
992576_web1_GolfCourseBall

There was a Pittsburgh-area presence at the annual Drive, Chip & Putt National Finals Sunday at Augusta National Golf Club in Augusta, Ga.

Whitehall native Michael Quallich finished eighth in the boys’ 7-9 age division. It was his third time competing but first trip to the finals.

Quallich, 9, is a fourth-grader at Whitehall Elementary School. He has a past-parallel swing like John Daly and soft hands around the green.

He said his favorite club to hit is his driver.

His best nine-hole score is 39 and his best 18-hole score an 82, had six points in the drive portion of the competition, three in the chipping part, and six in putting for a total of 15.

Conner Ford of Mt. Vernon, Ky., won the division with a score of 25.

Quallich made it through three rounds of qualifying to reach the finals, at Green Oaks Country Club (local), Mystic Rock at Nemacolin Woodlands Resort (subregional) and Muirfield Village (regional).

Other winners:

Boys

10-11: Sahish Reddy, Duluth, Ga.

12-13: Matthew Vital, Bethlehem, Pa.

14-15: Treed Huang, Katy, Texas

Girls

7-9: Angela Zhang, Bellevue, Wash.

10-11: Sophia Li, Fresh Meadows, N.Y.

12-13: Yanna Wilson, Henderson, Nev.

14-15: Nicole Gal, Oakville, Ontario

Full leaderboard: http://www.drivechipandputt.com/finals/leaderboard

Local qualfying is set for the 2020 competition.

Bill Beckner Jr. is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bill by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Other Local
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.