Why Penguins coach Mike Sullivan might stick with Game 1 lineup | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Why Penguins coach Mike Sullivan might stick with Game 1 lineup

Tim Benz
1013991_web1_1141794196
Getty Images
Penguins coach Mike Sullivan is seen against the New York Islanders in Game 1 of the Eastern Conference First Round on Wednesday, April 10, 2019, at NYCB Live’s Nassau Coliseum.

In Friday’s Sided.co podcast, Jonathan Bombulie, the Trib’s Penguins beat writer, joins me from Long Island to preview Game 2 of the Penguins-Islanders series.

We figure out why Mike Sullivan may stick with his failed lineup decisions from Game 1 against the Islanders. We also talk about why Phil Kessel and Evgeni Malkin were so good, why Sidney Crosby’s line struggled so much and why there is so much focus on the “what ifs” from Wednesday night.


LISTEN: Why Sullivan might stick with Game 1 lineup

Plus we dive into why Penguins fans shouldn’t panic over the Game 1 result, how things could’ve been different if they had started better and whether Robin Lehner can replicate his Game 1 performance.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.