ShareThis Page
Why were the Penguins so spotty on West Coast road trip? | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Why were the Penguins so spotty on West Coast road trip?

Tim Benz
| Tuesday, January 22, 2019 6:26 a.m

It’s our weekly Sided.co “Breakfast With Benz” hockey podcast with Brian Metzer of the Penguins Radio network.

Plenty of topics on the table this week.

• The Penguins were very spotty on that 2-3 west coast trip before the break. How come?

• How do the Pens currently compare to the rest of the Metro as they enjoy some downtime?


LISTEN: Tim Benz, Brian Metzer discuss Penguins’ spotty West Coast road trip?


• I think Derick Brassard and Morgan Burnett are actually the same person. We’ll see if Metz agrees.

• The Capitals are struggling, too. So that’s fun.

• How worried should we be about Patric Hornqvist’s concussions? Maybe Philadelphia’s Wayne Simmonds can provide power forward depth at the trade deadline.

• Most importantly, the new Rival Sons album comes out Friday. And Greta Van Fleet was on “Saturday Night Live” this weekend.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at tbenz@tribweb.com or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.